From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757370AbZBUB7I (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:59:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754742AbZBUB6x (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:58:53 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:46187 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754841AbZBUB6w (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:58:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:58:47 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Make cpufreq-nforce2 less obnoxious Message-ID: <20090221015847.GA12028@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Not owning an nforce2 is a sign of good taste, not an error. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c index 965ea52..36090cc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static int __init nforce2_init(void) /* detect chipset */ if (nforce2_detect_chipset()) { - printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset.\n"); + printk(KERN_INFO "cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset.\n"); return -ENODEV; } -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org