Re: [PATCH 0/9] PM: Fixes related to suspend and hibernation for 2.6.29

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:38:40AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009, Len Brown wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Len,
> > > 
> > > The following are fixes related to suspend and hibernation I have collected
> > > over the last couple of weeks.  Some of them are in -mm.  I think they all are
> > > 2.6.29 material.
> > > 
> > > 1/9 and 2/9 fix hibernation regression caused by the async boot changes,
> > > I hope Greg will not object if they go through your tree.
> > > 
> > > 3/9 fixes a long-standing hibernation issue that cause the resume partition
> > > to become unuseable after two consecutive failing attempts to hibernate.
> > > 
> > > 4/9 fixes build of kprobes.c with CONFIG_PM unset.
> > 
> > looks like this one added power/ twice --
> 
> That was on purpose.
> 
> > and looks like akpm sent a fixed version of this to linus already?
> 
> Yes, he did.
> 
> > > 5/9 and 6/9 clean up memory freeing code used during hibernation.
> > > 
> > > 7/9 fixes a bug related to the use of PM notifiers during hibernation with
> > > the help of the user land interface.
> > > 
> > > 8/9 and 9/9 fix the handling of consoles during suspend/hibernation.
> > > 
> > > Please add these patches to the suspend branch and push to Linus for 2.6.29.
> > 
> > All except #4 are now on the suspend branch.
> 
> 1/9 and 2/9 are also in the Greg's tree, AFAICS.
> 
> Greg, do you intend to push them to Linus?  In that case I think it's better if
> Len drops them.

I was not planning to send them for .29, sorry I got confused.  I'll
drop them from my tree and Len can send them all to Linus now.

Is that ok?

thanks,

greg k-h