From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754647AbZBVLH3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:07:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753457AbZBVLHS (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:07:18 -0500 Received: from silver.sucs.swan.ac.uk ([137.44.10.1]:54109 "EHLO silver.sucs.swan.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753444AbZBVLHR (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:07:17 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:07:13 +0000 From: Sitsofe Wheeler To: Thomas Meyer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout Message-ID: <20090222110713.GA5538@silver.sucs.org> References: <1234102609.6945.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1234102609.6945.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:16:49PM +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote: > My kernel message ring buffer seems to be flooded by these messages: > > Should I care? > > kernel version: v2.6.29-rc3-746-g396bb7a > > [ 84.204328] ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout (2422MHz) No, you probably shouldn't care - http://www.mail-archive.com/ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org/msg01463.html . Sounds like it's a known (but low impact) issue. -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/