From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755833AbZBVN6o (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:58:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752095AbZBVN6f (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:58:35 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.185]:13414 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751247AbZBVN6e (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:58:34 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=LIEhBChp2kuVcu1w6kii7H8OXova/H09TvKqEfiEDJ5C/lL2myLHj36/EYDFUg4U1a hBWWuUB0ecyb5F7ltG/bM1JCPZk6MLN63km3Sdw4v1papySoLElB3dHVUgEQSBB5qzhG KrX2nhjJLxUA8HA5jpsRXwnjxaytWXTLZSoTM= Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:58:18 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Miklos Szeredi Subject: Re: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host Message-ID: <20090222135818.GA12782@hack.private> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:50:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. > >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should >be listed and let me know (either way). > > >Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208 >Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host >Submitter : Miklos Szeredi >Date : 2008-12-12 9:35 (65 days old) >References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4 Hello, Miklos! I can't reproduce this on host 2.6.28.7 with uml guest of current git. Have you tried 2.6.28.7? Does it have the same problem? Thanks. -- "Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."