Re: kernel building procedure changed?

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:07:48AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I found a bit strange thing happens now --
> plain
> 
> 	make arch/x86/kernel/head64.o
> 
> doesn't work anymore. Instead of compiling
> _just_ this file I've got the following:
> 
> ---
> cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make arch/x86/kernel/head64.o
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
>   AS      arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
>   VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso-syms.lds
>   VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
>   VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syscall-syms.lds
>   VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
>   VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
>   LD      arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
>   CC      fs/hpfs/dnode.o
> make[2]: *** [fs/hpfs/dnode.o] Interrupt
> make[1]: *** [fs/hpfs] Interrupt
> make: *** [fs] Interrupt
> ---
> 
> I've done make allyesconfig previously.
> I don't understand what I'm doing wrong... :(

I should work...
Do you have CONFIG_64BIT set in your config?
Does it behave strange also for files in kernel/?
Can you postthe output of a "make V=1 arch/x86/kernel/head64.o"

I cannot try to reproduce locally as my current setup does not
support 64 bit x86 builds.
Does anyone else see the same?

	Sam