From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel building procedure changed?
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:14:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223081429.GB29898@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090223074837.GA29898@localhost>
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:37AM +0300]
...
| Sam, it seems I never paid attention on Makefile
| rules before. Which means -- I don't know if kernel
| build procedure should behave like it do now.
|
| We have the following rule (arch/x86/kernel/Makefile)
|
| extra-y := head_$(BITS).o head$(BITS).o head.o init_task.o
| vmlinux.lds
|
| Does it mean that any obj-y targets should be built before
| extra-y? If "yes" -- all is fine and works well and I'm just
| noising here (sorry for that).
|
| To be precise -- I don't remember how it worked before :)
| I mean it's possible that my previous workflow was:
|
| 1) build whole kernel by "make"
| 2) modify head_64.S
| 3) run "make arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o"
|
| So I will try to repeat these 3 points and report.
|
| - Cyrill -
Ok, I just finished building the whole kernel.
And now building this particular single file is
passed fine.
---
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make
...
Root device is (8, 5)
Setup is 11388 bytes (padded to 11776 bytes).
System is 2819 kB
CRC 3cf5b442
Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#13)
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
CC drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.mod.o
LD [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ patch -p1 < patches/x86-remove-balign
patching file arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
UPD include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
AS arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syscall-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
LD arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
CC kernel/trace/trace.o
LD kernel/trace/built-in.o
CC kernel/module.o
CC kernel/kexec.o
LD kernel/built-in.o
---
So all builds fine Sam. But frankly I don't understand why
I have to build the whole kernel to be able to compile
head_64.S.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-22 22:07 kernel building procedure changed? Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-22 22:13 ` Jesper Juhl
2009-02-22 22:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-22 22:27 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 23:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-22 23:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-23 7:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-23 8:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-02-22 22:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090223081429.GB29898@localhost \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox