From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757282AbZBWXE6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:04:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754575AbZBWXEt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:04:49 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51662 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754432AbZBWXEt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:04:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:04:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: mike@compulab.co.il, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: checkpatch --file warns about p0 patch Message-Id: <20090223150405.ce90a2c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090223144312.GC22617@shadowen.org> References: <49A2B0A5.8050905@compulab.co.il> <20090223144312.GC22617@shadowen.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:12 +0000 Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Hmm, that should already be fixed in the version Andrew Morton has. Hmm, all of these: checkpatch-make-in_atomic-ok-in-the-core.patch checkpatch-do-not-warn-about-p0-patches-when-checking-files.patch checkpatch-correctly-handle-type-spacing-in-the-face-of-modifiers.patch checkpatch-pointer-type-star-may-have-modifiers-following.patch checkpatch-a-modifier-is-not-an-identifier-at-the-end-of-a-type.patch checkpatch-extend-attribute-testing-to-all-modifiers.patch checkpatch-add-__ref-as-a-sparse-modifier.patch checkpatch-version-028.patch apart from perhaps checkpatch-add-__ref-as-a-sparse-modifier.patch look like bugfixes. So I suppose we should slip them into 2.6.29, yes?