public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/ftrace: add missing wake-up on some callsites
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:37:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223173714.GA601@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0902231211230.18221@gandalf.stny.rr.com>


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> > Which would send a delayed work to wake up?
> 
> No, I was thinking that trace_delay_wake_up() would be called 
> by these dangerous call sites. Then a per_cpu flag could be 
> set. We could have a trace point in the scheduler code that is 
> outside holding a runqueue lock, and this trace point would 
> call a trace function that will clear the per cpu flag, and 
> then call trace_wake_up().

No, that's very roundabout and ugly. If we putting a tracepoint 
there we might as well put real scheduler code there that looks 
for such a flag. But i'm not convinced we need a flag ...

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-23 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-22 21:56 [PATCH] tracing/ftrace: add missing wake-up on some callsites Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 22:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-23 15:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-23 15:42   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-23 16:26     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-23 16:51       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-23 17:05         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-23 17:13           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-23 17:34             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-23 17:37             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-23 18:03               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-23 18:09                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 17:04                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-23 16:22   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090223173714.GA601@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox