From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:08:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902240908.39423.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1vdr15s1v.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On Monday, February 23, 2009 3:08:44 am Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
> > Ok, I understood what is happening. Could you try the following patch?
> > It is currently in Jesse's linux-next.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=123364118418484&w=2
> >
> > BTW, I don't think surprise removal is well tested.
>
> That patch should guarantee that we don't loop forever, and if we are
> going to loop that looks like a reasonable way to handle it.
>
> When I start working on what is the most maintainable way to implement
> merge my hotplug driver work I will come back and test this.
>
> At the moment it appears that it will at least suffer from detecting a
> presence change event with a device showing up. Before pci structure
> for the device is removed. I seem to recall some dead locks on the
> pciehp work queue hotunplugging a hotplug driver as well.
Ah looks like Kenji-san wants this one pushed; so unless I hear otherwise I'll
queue it up in my for-linus branch for Linus to pull tomorrow or so.
Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-24 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 3:31 [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-29 7:34 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-13 19:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-14 4:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-14 12:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-14 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-16 8:02 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-17 23:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-18 5:48 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-23 11:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 17:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-24 17:08 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-02-16 8:00 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-18 0:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-18 7:12 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-18 8:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 6:18 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-23 11:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 17:38 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902240908.39423.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox