From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757810AbZBXM0l (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:26:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753660AbZBXM0c (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:26:32 -0500 Received: from minas.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.40]:38881 "EHLO minas.ics.muni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752925AbZBXM0c (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:26:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:26:41 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ext4 fs question Message-ID: <20090224122641.GA4752@ics.muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-echelon: NSA, CIA, CI5, MI5, FBI, KGB, BIS, Plutonium, Bin Laden, bomb User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Muni-Spam-TestIP: 147.251.3.109 X-Muni-Envelope-From: xhejtman@anubis.ics.muni.cz X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (minas.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.35]); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:26:27 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, is someone able to estimate how risky is to use ext4 fs without journal? I would like to use ext4 fs on my new shiny SSD where journal writes eat MLC erase cycles. -- Lukáš Hejtmánek