public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org,
	cpw@sgi.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86/core/percpu] improve the first percpu chunk allocation
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090224151512.GA12438@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A40624.4000100@kernel.org>


* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> > It's still about this restriction:
> > 
> > +       /*
> > +        * If large page isn't supported, there's no benefit in doing
> > +        * this.  Also, embedding allocation doesn't play well with
> > +        * NUMA.
> > +        */
> > +       if (!cpu_has_pse || pcpu_need_numa())
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > This is what makes no sense (why force the static percpu area 
> > into 4K mappings on NUMA).
> 
> No, the first allocator tried is remap allocator which will do 
> the 2MB remapping thing if NUMA.  If not, it gives its way to 
> embedding allocator which only kicks in for pse && !numa.  The 
> 4k thing is just the last resort.  We might as well kill it 
> and make it
> 
>  if (numa)
> 	do remap
>  else
> 	do embed
>  panic if failed
> 
> The 4k thing is the final fallback for cases where pse isn't 
> supported.

ah, ok :-) Then i was confused by that and wanted to see 
something implemented that ... was already there :)

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-24 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-24  3:11 [PATCHSET x86/core/percpu] improve the first percpu chunk allocation Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] percpu: fix pcpu_chunk_struct_size Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] bootmem: clean up arch-specific bootmem wrapping Tejun Heo
2009-02-24 11:30   ` Johannes Weiner
2009-02-24 11:39     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] bootmem: reorder interface functions and add a missing one Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] vmalloc: add @align to vm_area_register_early() Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86: update populate_extra_pte() and add populate_extra_pmd() Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] percpu: remove unit_size power-of-2 restriction Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] percpu: give more latitude to arch specific first chunk initialization Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86: separate out setup_pcpu_4k() from setup_per_cpu_areas() Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86: add embedding percpu first chunk allocator Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  3:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86: add remapping " Tejun Heo
2009-02-24  9:57 ` [PATCHSET x86/core/percpu] improve the first percpu chunk allocation Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 11:48   ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-24 12:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 13:27       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-24 14:12         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 14:37           ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-24 15:15             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-24 23:33               ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-04  0:03             ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-04  0:15               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-04  0:50                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 12:51     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 14:47       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-24 15:19         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 15:30           ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-24 13:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 14:40       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-24 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 20:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 21:02     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-24 21:12     ` [PATCH] x86: check range in reserve_early() -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-24 21:16     ` [PATCHSET x86/core/percpu] improve the first percpu chunk allocation Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25  2:09       ` [PATCH x86/core/percpu 1/2] x86, percpu: fix minor bugs in setup_percpu.c Tejun Heo
2009-02-25  2:10       ` [PATCH x86/core/percpu 2/2] x86: convert cacheflush macros inline functions Tejun Heo
2009-02-25  2:23       ` [PATCHSET x86/core/percpu] improve the first percpu chunk allocation Tejun Heo
2009-02-25  2:56         ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-25 12:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25 13:43           ` WARNING: at include/linux/percpu.h:159 __create_workqueue_key+0x1f6/0x220() Ingo Molnar
2009-02-26  2:03             ` [PATCH core/percpu] percpu: fix too low alignment restriction on UP Tejun Heo
2009-02-26  3:26               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25  6:40       ` [PATCHSET x86/core/percpu] improve the first percpu chunk allocation Rusty Russell
2009-02-25 12:54         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090224151512.GA12438@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=cpw@sgi.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox