public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce init() and exit() for platform_device
@ 2009-02-24 15:57 Paulius Zaleckas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paulius Zaleckas @ 2009-02-24 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: greg; +Cc: s.hauer, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

For changes and documentation about this fix please see:
[RFC PATCH 1/3] platform_device: add init() exit() callbacks

Other patches demonstrate how drivers can benefit from this change.

I have two questions:
1. Is init()/exit() OK? Or should I call it activate()/deactivate()?
   Other suggestions?
2. Now exit() returns nothing. Maybe it is better if it returned int?
   How to handle such exit failure?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-02-24 15:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-24 15:57 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce init() and exit() for platform_device Paulius Zaleckas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox