public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:10:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090225111002.GA15453@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A524D3.3090408@gmail.com>


* Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 24.2.2009 21:41, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/summit_32.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/summit_32.c
>> @@ -303,12 +303,10 @@ static inline unsigned int summit_cpu_mask_to_apicid(const cpumask_t *cpumask)
>>   	int cpu;
>>
>>   	num_bits_set = cpus_weight(*cpumask);
>> -	/* Return id to all */
>>   	if (num_bits_set>= nr_cpu_ids)
>> -		return 0xFF;
>> +		return BAD_APICID;
>
> Actually, wasn't this intended to return all available rather 
> than BAD (to which would correspond the comment), but 
> performed in a wrong manner? This is old code, any ideas who 
> would know this?
>
> In my opinion the check should be removed completely to allow 
> the code go through same-cluster check.
>
> In that case, the callers code is buggy, since it passes 
> online_cpu masks even on machines, where apics are not on the 
> same clusters.

It's most likely confusion in the old code. This used to be 
copy&paste-ed versions of different snapshots of the 
mach-default-code, hacked to make work on weird platforms. 
Mainline fixes/updates werent merged in consistently.

So could you please send a patch that fixes this?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-25 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-24 17:38 [PATCH 1/2] x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID jirislaby
2009-02-24 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86_32: summit_32, de-inline functions jirislaby
2009-02-24 17:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID Ingo Molnar
2009-02-24 20:41   ` [PATCH v2 " Jiri Slaby
2009-02-24 20:41     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86_32: summit_32, de-inline functions Jiri Slaby
2009-02-25 11:00     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID Jiri Slaby
2009-02-25 11:10       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-26 21:45         ` [PATCH 1/4] x86_32: apic/bigsmp_32, de-inline functions Jiri Slaby
2009-02-26 21:45           ` [PATCH 2/4] x86_32: apic/es7000_32, cpu_mask_to_apicid cleanup Jiri Slaby
2009-02-26 21:45             ` [PATCH 3/4] x86_32: apic/es7000_32, fix cpu_mask_to_apicid Jiri Slaby
2009-02-26 21:45               ` [PATCH 4/4] x86_32: apic/summit_32, " Jiri Slaby
2009-02-26 21:50               ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86_32: apic/es7000_32, " Jiri Slaby
2009-02-26 22:00         ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID Jiri Slaby
2009-02-28  8:21           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-02  9:53             ` [PATCH 1/4] x86_32: apic/bigsmp_32, de-inline functions Jiri Slaby
2009-03-02  9:53               ` [PATCH 2/4] x86_32: apic/es7000_32, cpu_mask_to_apicid cleanup Jiri Slaby
2009-03-02  9:53                 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86_32: apic/es7000_32, fix cpu_mask_to_apicid Jiri Slaby
2009-03-02  9:53                   ` [PATCH 4/4] x86_32: apic/summit_32, " Jiri Slaby
2009-03-08 17:00             ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID Jiri Slaby
2009-03-11  8:45               ` cpu_mask_to_apicid: Not a valid mask! [was: x86_32: summit_32, use BAD_APICID] Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090225111002.GA15453@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox