From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/core: introduce per cpu tracing files
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:13:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090225161309.GA5862@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090225130202.GH26273@elte.hu>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:02:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Impact: split up tracing output per cpu
>
> > So this patch creates a new directory inside /debug/tracing
> > (provided you have a debugfs mountpoint on /debug). Inside
> > this directory, you will now find one trace_pipe file, one
> > trace file and one latency_trace file per cpu. Which means if
> > you have two cpus, you will have:
> >
> > trace0
> > trace1
> > trace_pipe0
> > trace_pipe1
>
> Very nice! I've applied your patches to tip:tracing/ftrace.
>
> Could you please do one more tweak? The /debug/tracing/per_cpu/
> directory looks a bit cluttered on a 16-way box. It would be a
> nicer structure to have per CPU directories, i.e.:
>
> /debug/tracing/per_cpu/cpu0/trace
> /debug/tracing/per_cpu/cpu0/trace_pipe
> /debug/tracing/per_cpu/cpu1/trace
> /debug/tracing/per_cpu/cpu1/trace_pipe
>
> etc.
Ah right, the only SMP machine I have has two CPU so I didn't
think about that.
>
> Besides being easier to handle, this also makes it easy to
> extend the list of per CPU attributes as well, without
> cluttering the /debug/tracing/per_cpu/ directory.
>
> Ingo
You're right, I will change that.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 2:22 [PATCH 1/2] tracing/core: introduce per cpu tracing files Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-25 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25 16:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090225161309.GA5862@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox