From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758638AbZB0Bjq (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:39:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754069AbZB0Bjg (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:39:36 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:47173 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753489AbZB0Bjf (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:39:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:39:33 -0600 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: James Morris Cc: David Howells , "Eric W. Biederman" , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] keys: work correctly with user namespaces Message-ID: <20090227013933.GA6688@us.ibm.com> References: <20090227002709.GA31049@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org): > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Hi James, > > > > the following 4 patches apply on top of current security-testing-2.6 next > > branch. They implement strict separation of keys in different user > > namespaces. Do you mind sticking these in the security-testing tree? > > > > With these patches I can run the keyutils-tests simultaneously in two > > namespaces with no problems or failures. > > > > Applied. > > -- > James Morris > Thanks, James. -serge