From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756018AbZB1Xzj (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:55:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754651AbZB1Xzb (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:55:31 -0500 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:47183 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753148AbZB1Xza (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:55:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:55:26 +0000 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Andrew Morton Cc: mike@compulab.co.il, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: checkpatch --file warns about p0 patch Message-ID: <20090228235526.GA6023@shadowen.org> References: <49A2B0A5.8050905@compulab.co.il> <20090223144312.GC22617@shadowen.org> <20090223150405.ce90a2c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090223150405.ce90a2c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:04:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:12 +0000 > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > Hmm, that should already be fixed in the version Andrew Morton has. > > Hmm, all of these: > > checkpatch-make-in_atomic-ok-in-the-core.patch > checkpatch-do-not-warn-about-p0-patches-when-checking-files.patch > checkpatch-correctly-handle-type-spacing-in-the-face-of-modifiers.patch > checkpatch-pointer-type-star-may-have-modifiers-following.patch > checkpatch-a-modifier-is-not-an-identifier-at-the-end-of-a-type.patch > checkpatch-extend-attribute-testing-to-all-modifiers.patch > checkpatch-add-__ref-as-a-sparse-modifier.patch > checkpatch-version-028.patch > > apart from perhaps checkpatch-add-__ref-as-a-sparse-modifier.patch look > like bugfixes. So I suppose we should slip them into 2.6.29, yes? Yes those are all bugfixes. If we can get them in that would be good. -apw