From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] check files for checkpointability
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:00:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090301170010.GC18867@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228025743.GA22451@us.ibm.com>
Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> Dave Hansen [dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
> |
> | Introduce a files_struct counter to indicate whether a particular
> | file_struct has ever contained a file which can not be
> | checkpointed. This flag is a one-way trip; once it is set, it may
> | not be unset.
> |
> | We assume at allocation that a new files_struct is clean and may
> | be checkpointed. However, as soon as it has had its files filled
> | from its parent's, we check it for real in __scan_files_for_cr().
> | At that point, we mark it if it contained any uncheckpointable
> | files.
>
> Hmm. Why not just copy ->may_checkpoint setting from parent (or old)
> files_struct ? If parent is not checkpointable, then child won't be
> and vice-versa - no ?
No. We don't clear the files_struct checkpointable flag when an
uncheckpointable file is closed. But if the parent has closed
all uncheckpointable files before forking, then the child can
be started with a checkpointable files_struct.
Otherwise it wouldn't just be the task which has a one-way trip to
uncheckpointability, but process trees, and - assuming init does
anything uncheckpointable at all - the whole system :)
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-01 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 20:34 [RFC][PATCH 1/8] kill '_data' in cr_hdr_fd_data name Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] breakout fdinfo sprintf() into its own function Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:56 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-27 21:23 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] create fs flags to mark c/r supported fs's Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:16 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 21:20 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] file c/r: expose functions to query fs support Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:14 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 21:24 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:32 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 1:33 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 2:14 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-28 2:51 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 20:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-28 21:37 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 15:19 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-03 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-20 21:13 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-20 21:30 ` Oren Laadan
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mark /dev/null and zero as checkpointable Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] add c/r info to fdinfo Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] check files for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 2:57 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-01 17:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2009-03-04 23:41 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 19:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 13:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 15:56 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 15:59 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 16:27 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:22 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 17:30 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:44 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:58 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:13 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-05 8:20 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-02 16:28 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090301170010.GC18867@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox