public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] check files for checkpointability
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:00:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090301170010.GC18867@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228025743.GA22451@us.ibm.com>

Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> Dave Hansen [dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
> | 
> | Introduce a files_struct counter to indicate whether a particular
> | file_struct has ever contained a file which can not be
> | checkpointed.  This flag is a one-way trip; once it is set, it may
> | not be unset.
> | 
> | We assume at allocation that a new files_struct is clean and may
> | be checkpointed.  However, as soon as it has had its files filled
> | from its parent's, we check it for real in __scan_files_for_cr().
> | At that point, we mark it if it contained any uncheckpointable
> | files.
> 
> Hmm. Why not just copy ->may_checkpoint setting from parent (or old)
> files_struct ? If parent is not checkpointable, then child won't be
> and vice-versa - no ?

No.  We don't clear the files_struct checkpointable flag when an
uncheckpointable file is closed.  But if the parent has closed
all uncheckpointable files before forking, then the child can
be started with a checkpointable files_struct.

Otherwise it wouldn't just be the task which has a one-way trip to
uncheckpointability, but process trees, and - assuming init does
anything uncheckpointable at all - the whole system :)

-serge

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-01 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 20:34 [RFC][PATCH 1/8] kill '_data' in cr_hdr_fd_data name Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] breakout fdinfo sprintf() into its own function Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:56   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-27 21:23     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] create fs flags to mark c/r supported fs's Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:16   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 21:20     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] file c/r: expose functions to query fs support Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 21:24     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:32       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  1:33   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-28  2:51     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 20:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-28 21:37     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 15:19       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:05     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-03 13:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-20 21:13         ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-20 21:30           ` Oren Laadan
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mark /dev/null and zero as checkpointable Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] add c/r info to fdinfo Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] check files for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:57   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-01 17:00     ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2009-03-04 23:41     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 19:43   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 13:37   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 15:56     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 15:59     ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 16:27       ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:22         ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 17:30           ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:44             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:58               ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:13               ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:35                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-05  8:20                 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-02 16:28       ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090301170010.GC18867@us.ibm.com \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox