From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755647AbZCDAIp (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:08:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755436AbZCDAId (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:08:33 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.218.178]:40390 "EHLO mail-bw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755069AbZCDAIb (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:08:31 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Kz6d6kDqIlfl80yFBD1cYLlTf+QlKZ7AhXepiBM5uzWtMw9LPk9l1AHqqUN2oNgBcN O+QREDvX0C+UkwjGmdI50dAVsKjXtYhe1vgRWHMsDWgzLaK/1klQSUazHU9yXbjmfTuK +/WXEvP+ERhJiuVG4DEMTRcBCO0INJJiPeBZo= Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 01:06:59 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Joao Correia Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: some tc commands fail on 2.6.29-rc6-git5, works on 2.6.28.7 Message-ID: <20090304000659.GA4555@ami.dom.local> References: <20090301165729.8e08e1d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <49AC28FF.1040102@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:10:36PM +0000, Joao Correia wrote: > Hello again > > Sorry for taking so long, been busy with some unexpected work. > > I have checked the .config and can not (to the extent of my not-guru > knowledge) find anything out of place. Excuse me if its obvious and it > didnt strike me yet. ... > [root@duron ~]# tc -V > tc utility, iproute2-ss090115 ... Joao, you don't need to be sorry at all - on the contrary I'm extremely sorry! I was so focused on the kernel version but ignored updating iproute, and it looks like this matters here. So you're right. Alas I'll not be able to look at it until "tomorrow" in the evening. Thanks for the report, Jarek P.