From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755764AbZCDRht (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:37:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753819AbZCDRhk (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:37:40 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54154 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753673AbZCDRhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:37:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:37:14 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "jens.axboe" , Thomas Gleixner , lkml Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: block events Message-ID: <20090304173714.GD25962@elte.hu> References: <1236181529.5330.7912.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Subject: tracing: block events > > From: Peter Zijlstra > > Date: Wed Mar 04 15:09:43 CET 2009 > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra > > Peter, Thanks! > > I'll try it out. I know this is an RFC patch, but it could > really due with a change log ;-) also, i think there's some extra complexity in the blktrace tracepoints that needs the _SPECIAL macro - right? Ingo