From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755094AbZCEQEq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:04:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751933AbZCEQEf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:04:35 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.189]:3191 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751845AbZCEQEf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:04:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Wi5Ko1omdQvSjTgKjhADKSofu9wJ+MoTcZFCq96JLIOQrA++HqwgotoxxyhMEKJXTz N4iFAQcnu+ysVxXWl3zlXgLUtP5PZ+KzAnF5FYIzBuK6VX84IN2iyrcOTpnigqBFc+aQ 2DZOdI3UJnNrRH/owh2qFEH+7moU4Dp4a5RsU= Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 00:04:47 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang , uml-devel , linux-kernel Subject: Re: um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux Message-ID: <20090305160447.GB4265@hack.private> References: <49AFC206.9080004@panasas.com> <20090305130610.GA4265@hack.private> <49AFD780.8080500@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <49AFD780.8080500@panasas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >Américo Wang wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a >>> >>> Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um >>> give's me: >>> >>> LD vmlinux.o >>> MODPOST vmlinux.o >>> WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux >>> >>> >>> Sorry if this is a duplicate report >>> >> >> Weird... >> I tried to compile like what you said, I can't reproduce it. >> >> Which gcc are you using? >> >> Thanks. >> > >$ gcc --version >gcc (GCC) 4.3.2 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) > >I'm running on an x86_64 Fedora10 system (updated recently) >$ uname -o -s -r -m -p -i >Linux 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > I am using the same thing, but on i386. I still can't reproduce it. :( -- Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations!