From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: djwong@us.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lm90: Support the MAX6648/6692 chips
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:44:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090305174418.02fd9593@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090305154729.GL6550@plum>
Hi Darrick,
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:47:30 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:25:17PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I am confused. According to my notes, the MAX6648/MAX6692 is the same
> > chip as the MAX6646/MAX6647/MAX6649 (same chip ID of 0x59), the only
> > difference being the I2C address (0x4c for the MAX6646, 0x4e for the
> > MAX6647 and 0x4d for the MAX6648/MAX6649/MAX6692). So the current code
> > should _already_ detect your MAX6648 or MAX6692 as kind = max6646.
>
> Heh, yep, it does. I guess this patch has been sitting around long
> enough to become obsolete, sorry for the unnecessary mail traffic. I
> guess we can drop this one.
Well, confusion probably would have been avoided if it had been
properly documented that the MAX6648 and MAX6692 were already
supported. So I think we should still apply the Kconfig part of your
patch. Documentation/hwmon/lm90 would need a small update as well.
Could you please send an updated patch doing this? I would be happy to
apply that.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-05 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-02 21:01 [PATCH] lm90: Support the MAX6648/6692 chips Darrick J. Wong
2009-03-02 23:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-03 7:47 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-03 8:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-04 15:27 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-02 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-04 15:28 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-05 14:25 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-05 15:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-03-05 16:44 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-03-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] lm90: Document support for " Darrick J. Wong
2009-03-05 18:01 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-05 17:58 ` [PATCH] lm90: Update Documentation/hwmon/lm90 to reflect max6648/92 support Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090305174418.02fd9593@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox