From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757380AbZCFSpv (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:45:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756799AbZCFSpW (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:45:22 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:3953 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756781AbZCFSpU (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:45:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=kMAVkmge/gDnX53J10+ywknCYIVlOG0RXfi7B2kC/HukqjRUKzRoZJj2vRKfSSAPtE tj6mzJpOn9jiLOqj0JCsDu/FQo7jPkveGbkhTj6YZe9Zv4dIJ8hwjopA4pEEgV9xe9UL KizvUtTYWv4WYiIt5AxcMKlTbSxLpNefDhsUw= Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:45:14 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Joerg Roedel , mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] dma-debug: add hash functions for dma_debug_entries Message-ID: <20090306184514.GE7420@localhost> References: <1236346229-6618-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1236346229-6618-4-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20090306135052.GE5988@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090306135052.GE5988@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Frederic Weisbecker - Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:50:52PM +0100] ... | > +/* | > + * Add an entry to a hash bucket | > + */ | > +static void hash_bucket_add(struct hash_bucket *bucket, | > + struct dma_debug_entry *entry) | > +{ | > + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &bucket->list); | > +} | > + | > +/* | > + * Remove entry from a hash bucket list | > + */ | > +static void hash_bucket_del(struct dma_debug_entry *entry) | > +{ | > + list_del(&entry->list); | > +} | | | Perhaps the two wrappers above are unnecessary, since they are actually | used once and only wrap a single list operation. No? | | Frederic. Hi Frederic, I think it would be better to make them 'inline' only but remain the wrappers as is, since it show logic flow and hides internal data details. But it's my personal opinion. | ... - Cyrill -