Re: [PATCH 4/5 v3] tracing/core: drop the old ftrace_printk implementation in favour of ftrace_bprintk

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:49:04PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > i've put them into a separate branch forked off 
> > > > tip:tracing/ftrace: tip:tracing/printk. The two vsprintf 
> > > > patches are in tip:core/printk and merged into tracing/ftrace.
> > > > 
> > > > You can thus apply your current enhancements without any 
> > > > interaction with me - and merge tracing/printk into the 
> > > > tip:tracing/ftrace branch on your own schedule, ok?
> > > 
> > > ah - i misunderstood - i see that it interacts with your commits 
> > > from last night.
> > > 
> > > I've excluded tip:tracing/printk from tip:master for now and 
> > > will let you guys fix it up when you have time for it.
> > 
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > It compiles fine. Only a new item in the struct was added, nothing was 
> > removed. It just prints out a bit funny ;-)
> > 
> > You can go ahead and merge it into tracing/ftrace, and then I 
> > can work with that to fix up the formatting.
> 
> triggers this build failure on certain configs:
> 
> kernel/trace/trace.c:1205: error: implicit declaration of function 'vbin_printf'
> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:64: error: implicit declaration of function 'bstr_printf'
> 
> so i've excluded it from tip:master again for now.
> 
> 	Ingo


This is weird. Can you send me one of these configs please?