From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
jan sonnek <ha2nny@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: Regression - locking (all from 2.6.28)
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:28:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090306192812.GA26767@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236367186.10626.84.camel@nimitz>
Hi!
On Fri 2009-03-06 11:19:46, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:00 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > I think you should be more worried about consistency rather than missing
> > > entries. Take these two lines of code:
> > >
> > > start_pfn = node->node_start_pfn;
> > > /* hotplug occurs here */
> > > end_pfn = start_pfn + node->node_spanned_pages;
> > >
> > > What if someone comes in and adds memory to the node, at the beginning
> > > of the node, after you have calculated start_pfn? Try to think of what
> > > value you'll get for end_pfn and whether it is consistent and was *ever*
> > > valid at all. Would that oops the kernel?
> >
> > I assume pfn_valid() should handle this and kmemleak wouldn't scan the
> > page, unless we need locks around pfn_valid as well but I haven't seen
> > any used in the kernel.
>
> You assume incorrectly. :(
>
> Take my above example, and assume that you have two nodes which are
> right next to each other. You might run over the end of one node and
> into the next one. Your pages will be pfn_valid() but you will be on
> the wrong node.
>
> Please take a look at those locks that I mentioned. Notice that they
> are lock the pgdat *span*, not the validity of pages inside the pgdat.
> Your code deals with what pages the pgdats *span* and thus needs that
> lock. Notice that my example also had to do with those two lines of
> code incorrectly guessing the pgdat's *span*.
>
> We recently went to some pain to make sure that the software suspend
> code (which walks pgdat ranges as well) worked with memory hotplug.
> There really isn't that much code around that actually cares at runtime
> about which physical areas a particular node or zone spans. Yours is a
> rarity and will require some caution.
>
> You could probably also use the memory hotplug mutex found here:
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2008-November/018884.html
>
> But I'm not sure where those patches have gone. Hmmm. Pavel?
I don't think they were applied. They probably should... Rafael was
about to look into that, but he lost the patch pointer.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-06 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49AC334A.9030800@gmail.com>
2009-03-02 20:11 ` Regression - locking (all from 2.6.28) Andrew Morton
2009-03-03 10:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-03 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-05 0:54 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-05 18:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-05 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-06 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-06 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-06 17:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-06 17:26 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-06 18:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-06 19:19 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-06 19:28 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-03-16 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-17 0:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-14 16:24 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-16 17:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-03 18:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-22 4:45 jan sonnek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090306192812.GA26767@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ha2nny@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox