From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:49:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090308064952.GA30016@hack.private> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090306194921.GA2881@cs.unibo.it>
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:49:22PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>It is currently impossible to run a user-mode linux machine inside another user-mode
>linux (UML on UML). It breaks after a few instructions. When it tries to check
>whether SYSEMU is installed (the inner) UML receives an inconsistent result
>(from the outer UML).
>
>This is the output of a broken attempt:
>$ ./linux mem=256m ubd0=cow
>Locating the bottom of the address space ... 0x0
>Locating the top of the address space ... 0xc0000000
>Core dump limits :
> soft - 0
> hard - NONE
>Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
>Checking ptrace new tags for syscall emulation...unsupported
>Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256
>$
>
>The problem is the following:
>PTRACE_SYSCALL/SINGLESTEP is currently managed inside arch_ptrace for ARCH=um.
>
>PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP is not captured in arch_ptrace's switch, therefore
>it is erroneously passed back to ptrace_request (in kernel/ptrace).
>
>This simple patch simply forces ptrace to return an error on PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP
>as it is unsupported on ARCH=um, and fixes the problem.
>
>I posted the same patch one month ago. I just tested it again against the latest kernel.
>
> renzo
Thanks, renzo! Good work!
>
>Signed-off-by: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
>---
>diff -Naur linux-2.6.29-rc7/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c linux-2.6.29-rc7-umluml/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
>--- linux-2.6.29-rc7/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c 2008-12-25 00:26:37.000000000 +0100
>+++ linux-2.6.29-rc7-umluml/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c 2009-03-06 20:27:51.000000000 +0100
>@@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
> ret = poke_user(child, addr, data);
> break;
>
>+ case PTRACE_SYSEMU:
>+ case PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP:
>+ ret=-EIO;
>+ break;
>+
I think this is OK. Please feel free to add my reviewed-by:
Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Jeff, what do you think?
--
Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-08 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-06 19:49 [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start Renzo Davoli
2009-03-08 6:49 ` Américo Wang [this message]
2009-03-10 14:27 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090308064952.GA30016@hack.private \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox