public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
@ 2009-01-11 22:43 Pavel Machek
  2009-01-12 10:05 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-01-11 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel list, hmh, rpurdie

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9665 bytes --]


What about something like this? 

[Alternatively, I can add a flag to the leds class, and make delayed
leds a built-in functionality...]

[Attached is driver that uses new infrastructure for hp_accel, but it
does a bit more.]

---
 
It reduces code duplication and cleans
up code a bit. The code is already useful for thinkpad and hp_accel,
and there's one more driver that could use conversion.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
index 3478453..ee68654 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/input.h>
 #include <linux/leds.h>
 #include <linux/rfkill.h>
+#include <linux/delayed-leds.h>
+
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 #include <linux/dmi.h>
@@ -79,7 +81,6 @@ #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
 
 #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
 
-
 /* ThinkPad CMOS commands */
 #define TP_CMOS_VOLUME_DOWN	0
 #define TP_CMOS_VOLUME_UP	1
@@ -280,13 +281,8 @@ static u32 dbg_level;
 
 static struct workqueue_struct *tpacpi_wq;
 
-/* Special LED class that can defer work */
-struct tpacpi_led_classdev {
-	struct led_classdev led_classdev;
-	struct work_struct work;
-	enum led_brightness new_brightness;
-	unsigned int led;
-};
+
+
 
 /****************************************************************************
  ****************************************************************************
@@ -3462,9 +3458,13 @@ static int light_get_status(void)
 	return -ENXIO;
 }
 
-static int light_set_status(int status)
+static int light_set_brightness(struct delayed_led_classdev *data, enum led_brightness value)
 {
 	int rc;
+	int status = (value != LED_OFF);
+
+	if (tpacpi_lifecycle != TPACPI_LIFE_RUNNING)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (tp_features.light) {
 		if (cmos_handle) {
@@ -3482,37 +3482,24 @@ static int light_set_status(int status)
 	return -ENXIO;
 }
 
-static void light_set_status_worker(struct work_struct *work)
+static void light_set_class_brightness(struct delayed_led_classdev *data, enum led_brightness value)
 {
-	struct tpacpi_led_classdev *data =
-			container_of(work, struct tpacpi_led_classdev, work);
-
-	if (likely(tpacpi_lifecycle == TPACPI_LIFE_RUNNING))
-		light_set_status((data->new_brightness != LED_OFF));
+	light_set_brightness(data, value);
 }
 
-static void light_sysfs_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
-			enum led_brightness brightness)
-{
-	struct tpacpi_led_classdev *data =
-		container_of(led_cdev,
-			     struct tpacpi_led_classdev,
-			     led_classdev);
-	data->new_brightness = brightness;
-	queue_work(tpacpi_wq, &data->work);
-}
 
 static enum led_brightness light_sysfs_get(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
 {
 	return (light_get_status() == 1)? LED_FULL : LED_OFF;
 }
 
-static struct tpacpi_led_classdev tpacpi_led_thinklight = {
+static struct delayed_led_classdev tpacpi_led_thinklight = {
 	.led_classdev = {
 		.name		= "tpacpi::thinklight",
-		.brightness_set	= &light_sysfs_set,
+		.brightness_set	= &delayed_sysfs_set,
 		.brightness_get	= &light_sysfs_get,
-	}
+	},
+	.set_brightness = light_set_class_brightness,
 };
 
 static int __init light_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm)
@@ -3524,7 +3511,7 @@ static int __init light_init(struct ibm_
 	TPACPI_ACPIHANDLE_INIT(ledb);
 	TPACPI_ACPIHANDLE_INIT(lght);
 	TPACPI_ACPIHANDLE_INIT(cmos);
-	INIT_WORK(&tpacpi_led_thinklight.work, light_set_status_worker);
+	INIT_WORK(&tpacpi_led_thinklight.work, delayed_set_status_worker);
 
 	/* light not supported on 570, 600e/x, 770e, 770x, G4x, R30, R31 */
 	tp_features.light = (cmos_handle || lght_handle) && !ledb_handle;
@@ -3558,8 +3545,8 @@ static int __init light_init(struct ibm_
 static void light_exit(void)
 {
 	led_classdev_unregister(&tpacpi_led_thinklight.led_classdev);
-	if (work_pending(&tpacpi_led_thinklight.work))
-		flush_workqueue(tpacpi_wq);
+	while (work_pending(&tpacpi_led_thinklight.work))
+		schedule();
 }
 
 static int light_read(char *p)
@@ -3600,7 +3587,7 @@ static int light_write(char *buf)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	return light_set_status(newstatus);
+	return light_set_brightness(&tpacpi_led_thinklight, newstatus);
 }
 
 static struct ibm_struct light_driver_data = {
@@ -4020,7 +4007,7 @@ TPACPI_HANDLE(led, ec, "SLED",	/* 570 */
 	   );			/* R30, R31 */
 
 #define TPACPI_LED_NUMLEDS 8
-static struct tpacpi_led_classdev *tpacpi_leds;
+static struct delayed_led_classdev *tpacpi_leds;
 static enum led_status_t tpacpi_led_state_cache[TPACPI_LED_NUMLEDS];
 static const char * const tpacpi_led_names[TPACPI_LED_NUMLEDS] = {
 	/* there's a limit of 19 chars + NULL before 2.6.26 */
@@ -4064,7 +4051,6 @@ static int led_set_status(const unsigned
 	/* off, on, blink. Index is led_status_t */
 	static const unsigned int led_sled_arg1[] = { 0, 1, 3 };
 	static const unsigned int led_led_arg1[] = { 0, 0x80, 0xc0 };
-
 	int rc = 0;
 
 	switch (led_supported) {
@@ -4104,40 +4090,21 @@ static int led_set_status(const unsigned
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static void led_sysfs_set_status(unsigned int led,
-				 enum led_brightness brightness)
-{
-	led_set_status(led,
-			(brightness == LED_OFF) ?
-			TPACPI_LED_OFF :
-			(tpacpi_led_state_cache[led] == TPACPI_LED_BLINK) ?
-				TPACPI_LED_BLINK : TPACPI_LED_ON);
-}
-
-static void led_set_status_worker(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	struct tpacpi_led_classdev *data =
-		container_of(work, struct tpacpi_led_classdev, work);
-
-	if (likely(tpacpi_lifecycle == TPACPI_LIFE_RUNNING))
-		led_sysfs_set_status(data->led, data->new_brightness);
-}
-
-static void led_sysfs_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
-			enum led_brightness brightness)
+static void led_set_class_brightness(struct delayed_led_classdev *data, enum led_brightness value)
 {
-	struct tpacpi_led_classdev *data = container_of(led_cdev,
-			     struct tpacpi_led_classdev, led_classdev);
-
-	data->new_brightness = brightness;
-	queue_work(tpacpi_wq, &data->work);
+	if (tpacpi_lifecycle != TPACPI_LIFE_RUNNING)
+		return;
+	led_set_status(data->led, (value == LED_OFF) ?
+                       TPACPI_LED_OFF :
+                       (tpacpi_led_state_cache[data->led] == TPACPI_LED_BLINK) ?
+		       TPACPI_LED_BLINK : TPACPI_LED_ON);
 }
 
 static int led_sysfs_blink_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
 			unsigned long *delay_on, unsigned long *delay_off)
 {
-	struct tpacpi_led_classdev *data = container_of(led_cdev,
-			     struct tpacpi_led_classdev, led_classdev);
+	struct delayed_led_classdev *data = container_of(led_cdev,
+			     struct delayed_led_classdev, led_classdev);
 
 	/* Can we choose the flash rate? */
 	if (*delay_on == 0 && *delay_off == 0) {
@@ -4148,7 +4115,7 @@ static int led_sysfs_blink_set(struct le
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	data->new_brightness = TPACPI_LED_BLINK;
-	queue_work(tpacpi_wq, &data->work);
+	schedule_work(&data->work);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -4157,8 +4124,8 @@ static enum led_brightness led_sysfs_get
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	struct tpacpi_led_classdev *data = container_of(led_cdev,
-			     struct tpacpi_led_classdev, led_classdev);
+	struct delayed_led_classdev *data = container_of(led_cdev,
+			     struct delayed_led_classdev, led_classdev);
 
 	rc = led_get_status(data->led);
 
@@ -4217,15 +4184,16 @@ static int __init led_init(struct ibm_in
 	for (i = 0; i < TPACPI_LED_NUMLEDS; i++) {
 		tpacpi_leds[i].led = i;
 
-		tpacpi_leds[i].led_classdev.brightness_set = &led_sysfs_set;
+		tpacpi_leds[i].led_classdev.brightness_set = &delayed_sysfs_set;
 		tpacpi_leds[i].led_classdev.blink_set = &led_sysfs_blink_set;
 		if (led_supported == TPACPI_LED_570)
 			tpacpi_leds[i].led_classdev.brightness_get =
 							&led_sysfs_get;
 
 		tpacpi_leds[i].led_classdev.name = tpacpi_led_names[i];
+		tpacpi_leds[i].set_brightness = led_set_class_brightness;
 
-		INIT_WORK(&tpacpi_leds[i].work, led_set_status_worker);
+		INIT_WORK(&tpacpi_leds[i].work, delayed_set_status_worker);
 
 		rc = led_classdev_register(&tpacpi_pdev->dev,
 					   &tpacpi_leds[i].led_classdev);
diff --git a/include/linux/delayed-leds.h b/include/linux/delayed-leds.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..31644b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/delayed-leds.h
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ *  delayed-leds.h - LEDs that can't be set from atomic context
+ *
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2004-2005 Borislav Deianov <borislav@users.sf.net>
+ *  Copyright (C) 2006-2008 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
+ *
+ *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ *  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ *  (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+
+/* Special LED class that can defer work */
+struct delayed_led_classdev {
+	struct led_classdev led_classdev;
+	struct work_struct work;
+	enum led_brightness new_brightness;
+
+	unsigned int led;		/* For driver */
+	void (*set_brightness)(struct delayed_led_classdev *data, enum led_brightness value);
+};
+
+static inline void delayed_set_status_worker(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct delayed_led_classdev *data =
+			container_of(work, struct delayed_led_classdev, work);
+
+	data->set_brightness(data, data->new_brightness);
+}
+
+static inline void delayed_sysfs_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
+			      enum led_brightness brightness)
+{
+	struct delayed_led_classdev *data = container_of(led_cdev,
+			     struct delayed_led_classdev, led_classdev);
+	data->new_brightness = brightness;
+	schedule_work(&data->work);
+}




-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: delme --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 12282 bytes --]

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/hp_accel.c b/drivers/hwmon/hp_accel.c
index bd8497b..284508b 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/hp_accel.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/hp_accel.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include <linux/freezer.h>
 #include <linux/version.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/leds.h>
+#include <linux/delayed-leds.h>
 #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 #include "lis3lv02d.h"
@@ -155,29 +156,52 @@ static struct dmi_system_id lis3lv02d_dm
  */
 };
 
-static acpi_status hpled_acpi_write(acpi_handle handle, int reg)
+static void hpled_set(struct delayed_led_classdev *led_cdev, enum led_brightness value)
 {
+	acpi_handle handle = adev.device->handle;
 	unsigned long long ret; /* Not used when writing */
 	union acpi_object in_obj[1];
 	struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, in_obj };
 
 	in_obj[0].type          = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-	in_obj[0].integer.value = reg;
+	in_obj[0].integer.value = !!value;
 
-	return acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "ALED", &args, &ret);
+	acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "ALED", &args, &ret);
 }
 
-static void hpled_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
-			       enum led_brightness value)
+static struct delayed_led_classdev hpled_led = {
+	.led_classdev = {
+		.name			= "hp::hddprotect",
+		.default_trigger	= "none",
+		.brightness_set		= delayed_sysfs_set,
+		.flags                  = LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME,
+	},
+	.set_brightness = hpled_set,
+};
+
+static acpi_status
+lis3lv02d_get_resource(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context)
 {
-	hpled_acpi_write(adev.device->handle, !!value);
+	if (resource->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ) {
+		struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *irq;
+		u32 *device_irq = context;
+
+		irq = &resource->data.extended_irq;
+		*device_irq = irq->interrupts[0];
+	}
+
+	return AE_OK;
 }
 
-static struct led_classdev hpled_led = {
-	.name			= "hp:red:hddprotection",
-	.default_trigger	= "heartbeat",
-	.brightness_set		= hpled_set,
-};
+static void lis3lv02d_enum_resources(struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = acpi_walk_resources(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
+					lis3lv02d_get_resource, &adev.irq);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG DRIVER_NAME ": Error getting resources\n");
+}
 
 static int lis3lv02d_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
@@ -208,13 +232,20 @@ static int lis3lv02d_add(struct acpi_dev
 		adev.ac = lis3lv02d_axis_normal;
 	}
 
-	ret = led_classdev_register(NULL, &hpled_led);
+	INIT_WORK(&hpled_led.work, delayed_set_status_worker);
+	ret = led_classdev_register(NULL, &hpled_led.led_classdev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* obtain IRQ number of our device from ACPI */
+	lis3lv02d_enum_resources(adev.device);
+
 	ret = lis3lv02d_init_device(&adev);
 	if (ret) {
-		led_classdev_unregister(&hpled_led);
+		while (work_pending(&hpled_led.work))
+			schedule();
+
+		led_classdev_unregister(&hpled_led.led_classdev);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -229,7 +260,9 @@ static int lis3lv02d_remove(struct acpi_
 	lis3lv02d_joystick_disable();
 	lis3lv02d_poweroff(device->handle);
 
-	led_classdev_unregister(&hpled_led);
+	while (work_pending(&hpled_led.work))
+		schedule();
+	led_classdev_unregister(&hpled_led.led_classdev);
 
 	return lis3lv02d_remove_fs();
 }
@@ -240,7 +273,6 @@ static int lis3lv02d_suspend(struct acpi
 {
 	/* make sure the device is off when we suspend */
 	lis3lv02d_poweroff(device->handle);
-	led_classdev_suspend(&hpled_led);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -253,7 +285,6 @@ static int lis3lv02d_resume(struct acpi_
 	else
 		lis3lv02d_poweroff(device->handle);
 	mutex_unlock(&adev.lock);
-	led_classdev_resume(&hpled_led);
 	return 0;
 }
 #else
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
index 219d2d0..7dc3eb2 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/poll.h>
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
 #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 #include "lis3lv02d.h"
@@ -52,10 +53,20 @@ #define MDPS_POLL_INTERVAL 50
  * joystick.
  */
 
+/*
+ * Automatic timeout to turn off the device in jiffies.
+ * Don't do it too early as it's quite costly to turn it on.
+ */
+#define MDPS_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(30 * 1000) /* 30 seconds */
 /* Maximum value our axis may get for the input device (signed 12 bits) */
 #define MDPS_MAX_VAL 2048
 
-struct acpi_lis3lv02d adev;
+struct acpi_lis3lv02d adev = {
+	.misc_wait   = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(adev.misc_wait),
+	.usage       = 0,
+	.misc_opened = 0,
+};
+
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(adev);
 
 static int lis3lv02d_add_fs(struct acpi_device *device);
@@ -110,17 +121,14 @@ static void lis3lv02d_get_xyz(acpi_handl
 void lis3lv02d_poweroff(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	adev.is_on = 0;
-	/* disable X,Y,Z axis and power down */
-	adev.write(handle, CTRL_REG1, 0x00);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lis3lv02d_poweroff);
 
 void lis3lv02d_poweron(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	u8 val;
-
 	adev.is_on = 1;
 	adev.init(handle);
+#if 0
 	adev.write(handle, FF_WU_CFG, 0);
 	/*
 	 * BDU: LSB and MSB values are not updated until both have been read.
@@ -130,6 +138,21 @@ void lis3lv02d_poweron(acpi_handle handl
 	adev.read(handle, CTRL_REG2, &val);
 	val |= CTRL2_BDU | CTRL2_IEN;
 	adev.write(handle, CTRL_REG2, val);
+	if (test_bit(0, &adev.misc_opened)) {
+#if 0
+		/* Threshold not too big (10) */
+		lis3lv02d_write_16(handle, FF_WU_THS_L, 10);
+#endif
+		/* FIXME: All this should be done by BIOS, automagically */
+		/* 2 samples in a row before activation */
+		adev.write(handle, FF_WU_DURATION, 2);
+		/* detect every direction, don't wait for validation */
+		adev.write(handle, FF_WU_CFG, FF_WU_CFG_AOI
+			   	   | FF_WU_CFG_XLIE | FF_WU_CFG_XHIE
+				   | FF_WU_CFG_YLIE | FF_WU_CFG_YHIE
+				   | FF_WU_CFG_ZLIE | FF_WU_CFG_ZHIE);
+	}
+#endif
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lis3lv02d_poweron);
 
@@ -162,6 +185,161 @@ static void lis3lv02d_decrease_use(struc
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
 }
 
+static void lis3lv02d_poweroff_timeout(unsigned long data)
+{
+	struct acpi_lis3lv02d *dev = (void *)data;
+	lis3lv02d_poweroff(dev->device->handle);
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG DRIVER_NAME ": Turning off the device\n");
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t lis302dl_interrupt(int irq, void *dummy)
+{
+//	unsigned long long lret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Be careful: on some HP laptops the bios force DD when on battery and
+	 * the lid is closed. This leads to interrupts as soon as a little move
+	 * is done.
+	 */
+	atomic_inc(&adev.count);
+
+	wake_up_interruptible(&adev.misc_wait);
+	kill_fasync(&adev.async_queue, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+
+
+	printk("lis3_interrupt: its here\n");
+//	acpi_evaluate_object(adev.device->handle, "CLRI", NULL, &lret);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int lis3lv02d_misc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	unsigned long long lret;
+	int ret;
+
+	printk("lis3: misc dev open\n");
+
+	if (test_and_set_bit(0, &adev.misc_opened))
+		return -EBUSY; /* already open */
+
+	atomic_set(&adev.count, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * The sensor can generate interrupts for free-fall and direction
+	 * detection (distinguishable with FF_WU_SRC and DD_SRC) but to keep
+	 * the things simple and _fast_ we activate it only for free-fall, so
+	 * no need to read register (very slow with ACPI). For the same reason,
+	 * we forbid shared interrupts.
+	 *
+	 * IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING seems pointless on HP laptops because the
+	 * io-apic is not configurable (and generates a warning) but I keep it
+	 * in case of support for other hardware.
+	 */
+	ret = request_irq(adev.irq, lis302dl_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
+			  DRIVER_NAME, &adev);
+
+	if (ret) {
+		clear_bit(0, &adev.misc_opened);
+		printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME ": IRQ%d allocation failed\n", adev.irq);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+	lis3lv02d_increase_use(&adev);
+	printk("lis3: registered interrupt %d\n", adev.irq);
+
+//	acpi_evaluate_object(adev.device->handle, "CLRI", NULL, &lret);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int lis3lv02d_misc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	fasync_helper(-1, file, 0, &adev.async_queue);
+	lis3lv02d_decrease_use(&adev);
+	free_irq(adev.irq, &adev);
+	clear_bit(0, &adev.misc_opened); /* release the device */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t lis3lv02d_misc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
+				size_t count, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
+	u32 data;
+	unsigned char byte_data;
+	ssize_t retval = 1;
+
+	printk("lis3: read\n");
+
+	if (count < 1)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	add_wait_queue(&adev.misc_wait, &wait);
+	while (true) {
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+		data = atomic_xchg(&adev.count, 0);
+		if (data)
+			break;
+
+		if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
+			retval = -EAGAIN;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
+			retval = -ERESTARTSYS;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		schedule();
+	}
+
+	if (data < 255)
+		byte_data = data;
+	else
+		byte_data = 255;
+
+	/* make sure we are not going into copy_to_user() with
+	 * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state */
+	set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+	if (copy_to_user(buf, &byte_data, sizeof(byte_data)))
+		retval = -EFAULT;
+
+out:
+	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+	remove_wait_queue(&adev.misc_wait, &wait);
+
+	return retval;
+}
+
+static unsigned int lis3lv02d_misc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
+{
+	poll_wait(file, &adev.misc_wait, wait);
+	if (atomic_read(&adev.count))
+		return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int lis3lv02d_misc_fasync(int fd, struct file *file, int on)
+{
+	return fasync_helper(fd, file, on, &adev.async_queue);
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations lis3lv02d_misc_fops = {
+	.owner   = THIS_MODULE,
+	.llseek  = no_llseek,
+	.read    = lis3lv02d_misc_read,
+	.open    = lis3lv02d_misc_open,
+	.release = lis3lv02d_misc_release,
+	.poll    = lis3lv02d_misc_poll,
+	.fasync  = lis3lv02d_misc_fasync,
+};
+
+static struct miscdevice lis3lv02d_misc_device = {
+	.minor   = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+	.name    = "freefall",
+	.fops    = &lis3lv02d_misc_fops,
+};
+
 /**
  * lis3lv02d_joystick_kthread - Kthread polling function
  * @data: unused - here to conform to threadfn prototype
@@ -203,7 +381,6 @@ static void lis3lv02d_joystick_close(str
 	lis3lv02d_decrease_use(&adev);
 }
 
-
 static inline void lis3lv02d_calibrate_joystick(void)
 {
 	lis3lv02d_get_xyz(adev.device->handle, &adev.xcalib, &adev.ycalib, &adev.zcalib);
@@ -250,7 +427,9 @@ void lis3lv02d_joystick_disable(void)
 	if (!adev.idev)
 		return;
 
+	misc_deregister(&lis3lv02d_misc_device);
 	input_unregister_device(adev.idev);
+	del_timer(&adev.poff_timer);
 	adev.idev = NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lis3lv02d_joystick_disable);
@@ -261,13 +440,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lis3lv02d_joystick_dis
  */
 int lis3lv02d_init_device(struct acpi_lis3lv02d *dev)
 {
+	printk("lis3_init_device\n");
 	mutex_init(&dev->lock);
 	lis3lv02d_add_fs(dev->device);
+	setup_timer(&dev->poff_timer, lis3lv02d_poweroff_timeout, (unsigned long)dev);
+	init_timer_deferrable(&dev->poff_timer);
 	lis3lv02d_increase_use(dev);
 
 	if (lis3lv02d_joystick_enable())
 		printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME ": joystick initialization failed\n");
 
+	printk("lis3_init_device: irq %d\n", dev->irq);
+
+	/* if we did not get an IRQ from ACPI - we have nothing more to do */
+	if (!dev->irq) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME
+			": No IRQ in ACPI. Disabling /dev/accel\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	printk("lis3: registering device\n");
+	if (misc_register(&lis3lv02d_misc_device))
+		printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME ": misc_register failed\n");
+out:
 	lis3lv02d_decrease_use(dev);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.h b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.h
index 223f1c0..7f2c514 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.h
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.h
@@ -170,6 +170,12 @@ struct acpi_lis3lv02d {
 	unsigned char		is_on;     /* whether the device is on or off */
 	unsigned char		usage;     /* usage counter */
 	struct axis_conversion	ac;        /* hw -> logical axis */
+
+	u32			irq;       /* IRQ number */
+	struct timer_list	poff_timer; /* for automatic power off */
+	struct fasync_struct	*async_queue; /* queue for the misc device */
+	wait_queue_head_t	misc_wait; /* Wait queue for the misc device */
+	unsigned long		misc_opened; /* bit0: whether the device is open */
 };
 
 int lis3lv02d_init_device(struct acpi_lis3lv02d *dev);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
  2009-01-11 22:43 introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication Pavel Machek
@ 2009-01-12 10:05 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  2009-01-19 15:02   ` Pavel Machek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh @ 2009-01-12 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: kernel list, rpurdie

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> What about something like this? 
> 
> [Alternatively, I can add a flag to the leds class, and make delayed
> leds a built-in functionality...]
> 
> [Attached is driver that uses new infrastructure for hp_accel, but it
> does a bit more.]

FWIW, I am looking over the thinkpad-acpi side of this.  I like the idea,
but I am not completely sure I agree fully with the changes to
thinkpad-acpi.

Which isn't a problem, as long as the thinkpad-acpi hunks are NOT merged to
any tree before my ACK, please.  I will test and comment on the patch before
the weekend.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
  2009-01-12 10:05 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
@ 2009-01-19 15:02   ` Pavel Machek
  2009-01-20 12:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-01-19 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh; +Cc: kernel list, rpurdie

On Mon 2009-01-12 08:05:01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > What about something like this? 
> > 
> > [Alternatively, I can add a flag to the leds class, and make delayed
> > leds a built-in functionality...]
> > 
> > [Attached is driver that uses new infrastructure for hp_accel, but it
> > does a bit more.]
> 
> FWIW, I am looking over the thinkpad-acpi side of this.  I like the idea,
> but I am not completely sure I agree fully with the changes to
> thinkpad-acpi.
> 
> Which isn't a problem, as long as the thinkpad-acpi hunks are NOT merged to
> any tree before my ACK, please.  I will test and comment on the patch before
> the weekend.

Any news?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
  2009-01-19 15:02   ` Pavel Machek
@ 2009-01-20 12:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  2009-01-21 16:54       ` Richard Purdie
  2009-03-08  8:29       ` Pavel Machek
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh @ 2009-01-20 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: kernel list, rpurdie

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-01-12 08:05:01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > What about something like this? 
> > > 
> > > [Alternatively, I can add a flag to the leds class, and make delayed
> > > leds a built-in functionality...]
> > > 
> > > [Attached is driver that uses new infrastructure for hp_accel, but it
> > > does a bit more.]
> > 
> > FWIW, I am looking over the thinkpad-acpi side of this.  I like the idea,
> > but I am not completely sure I agree fully with the changes to
> > thinkpad-acpi.
> > 
> > Which isn't a problem, as long as the thinkpad-acpi hunks are NOT merged to
> > any tree before my ACK, please.  I will test and comment on the patch before
> > the weekend.
> 
> Any news?

Sure.  Sorry for not replying earlier.

I don't like the loss of functionality of the private workqueue.  I kicked
the thinkpad led handling to a private workqueue in order to never tie up
the system-wide one with crap spinning around in the ACPI layer, etc.  In
fact, all thinkpad-acpi deferred work is in the private workqueue for this
reason.

This is easy enough to fix, you just need to provide both versions of the
interface (standard workqueue, and private workqueue).  OTOH, if nowadays
the system-wide workqueue runs tasks in parallel and there is no risk of a
task blocking others from completely unrelated subsystems, I can ditch the
private workqueue.

Also, if it is going to be generic, I'd suggest the usual "void *data"
opaque type to carry information for the driver, instead of a "led number".

I didn't see any comments from Richard, but your comment about a flag seems
to imply there was a private one?  IMHO enhancing the led class would be the
best way to go about it, although deferred leds are simple enough that it
doesn't matter much.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
  2009-01-20 12:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
@ 2009-01-21 16:54       ` Richard Purdie
  2009-03-08  8:29       ` Pavel Machek
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2009-01-21 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh; +Cc: Pavel Machek, kernel list

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:04 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I don't like the loss of functionality of the private workqueue.  I kicked
> the thinkpad led handling to a private workqueue in order to never tie up
> the system-wide one with crap spinning around in the ACPI layer, etc.  In
> fact, all thinkpad-acpi deferred work is in the private workqueue for this
> reason.
> 
> This is easy enough to fix, you just need to provide both versions of the
> interface (standard workqueue, and private workqueue).  OTOH, if nowadays
> the system-wide workqueue runs tasks in parallel and there is no risk of a
> task blocking others from completely unrelated subsystems, I can ditch the
> private workqueue.
> 
> Also, if it is going to be generic, I'd suggest the usual "void *data"
> opaque type to carry information for the driver, instead of a "led number".
> 
> I didn't see any comments from Richard, but your comment about a flag seems
> to imply there was a private one?  IMHO enhancing the led class would be the
> best way to go about it, although deferred leds are simple enough that it
> doesn't matter much.

I think the best approach is to get this header working and then see how
many people can really share it. If its common enough we can add to the
core but lets see if its a useful abstraction first?

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
Richard Purdie
Intel Open Source Technology Centre


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
  2009-01-20 12:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  2009-01-21 16:54       ` Richard Purdie
@ 2009-03-08  8:29       ` Pavel Machek
  2009-03-11  1:39         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-03-08  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh; +Cc: kernel list, rpurdie

On Tue 2009-01-20 10:04:00, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2009-01-12 08:05:01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > What about something like this? 
> > > > 
> > > > [Alternatively, I can add a flag to the leds class, and make delayed
> > > > leds a built-in functionality...]
> > > > 
> > > > [Attached is driver that uses new infrastructure for hp_accel, but it
> > > > does a bit more.]
> > > 
> > > FWIW, I am looking over the thinkpad-acpi side of this.  I like the idea,
> > > but I am not completely sure I agree fully with the changes to
> > > thinkpad-acpi.
> > > 
> > > Which isn't a problem, as long as the thinkpad-acpi hunks are NOT merged to
> > > any tree before my ACK, please.  I will test and comment on the patch before
> > > the weekend.
> > 
> > Any news?
> 
> Sure.  Sorry for not replying earlier.
> 
> I don't like the loss of functionality of the private workqueue.  I kicked
> the thinkpad led handling to a private workqueue in order to never tie up
> the system-wide one with crap spinning around in the ACPI layer, etc.  In
> fact, all thinkpad-acpi deferred work is in the private workqueue for this
> reason.

Is the private workqueue really required? AFAICT workqueues are not
exactly cheap, and leds are not toggled that often. Was it problem in
practice?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication
  2009-03-08  8:29       ` Pavel Machek
@ 2009-03-11  1:39         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh @ 2009-03-11  1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Machek; +Cc: kernel list, rpurdie

On Sun, 08 Mar 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2009-01-20 10:04:00, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Mon 2009-01-12 08:05:01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > What about something like this? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [Alternatively, I can add a flag to the leds class, and make delayed
> > > > > leds a built-in functionality...]
> > > > > 
> > > > > [Attached is driver that uses new infrastructure for hp_accel, but it
> > > > > does a bit more.]
> > > > 
> > > > FWIW, I am looking over the thinkpad-acpi side of this.  I like the idea,
> > > > but I am not completely sure I agree fully with the changes to
> > > > thinkpad-acpi.
> > > > 
> > > > Which isn't a problem, as long as the thinkpad-acpi hunks are NOT merged to
> > > > any tree before my ACK, please.  I will test and comment on the patch before
> > > > the weekend.
> > > 
> > > Any news?
> > 
> > Sure.  Sorry for not replying earlier.
> > 
> > I don't like the loss of functionality of the private workqueue.  I kicked
> > the thinkpad led handling to a private workqueue in order to never tie up
> > the system-wide one with crap spinning around in the ACPI layer, etc.  In
> > fact, all thinkpad-acpi deferred work is in the private workqueue for this
> > reason.
> 
> Is the private workqueue really required? AFAICT workqueues are not
> exactly cheap, and leds are not toggled that often. Was it problem in
> practice?

Well, the day we can trust the main workqueue not to block or delay
important stuff, I will use it.  Until then, I feel it is best to have
thinkpad-acpi work scheduled independently from the important stuff.

The private workqueue is NOT used just for the LEDs, it is used for
every thinkpad-acpi deferred-work needs.  And I'd rather the thinkpad-acpi
LED work didn't move to the main workqueue.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-11  1:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-11 22:43 introduce delayed-leds.h to reduce code duplication Pavel Machek
2009-01-12 10:05 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-01-19 15:02   ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-20 12:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-01-21 16:54       ` Richard Purdie
2009-03-08  8:29       ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-11  1:39         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox