Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] track files for checkpointability

Dave Hansen
2009-03-10T16:23:19Z

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:57 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> From a0fb96aa41c4d360559013cfd7f32f07f449c1c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:23:02 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] checkpoint: make files_deny_checkpointing print task
> name and pid
>
> This lets the developer know *which* task performed an action that
> prevents checkpoint.

Can you think of any case where we wouldn't be calling
foo_deny_checkpoint() for a task other than current? Should we just use
current in the function directly instead of passing it in?

-- Dave