public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	zach.brown@oracle.com, bcrl@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:36:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090309203624.GA2812@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B571C7.3010005@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Or you could queue the completions somewhere, and only copy them to
> user memory when io_getevents() is called.  I think the plan was
> once to allow events to be consumed opportunistically even without
> io_getevents(), though.

Isn't that integrated (or to be integrated) with the vring buffer
thingy used by virtio?

If not, should it be?

> Sorry, I didn't actually take a look at the patches.  I only reacted to 
> the description - I am allergic to pinned memory.

While we're at it I'm allergic to fixed size ring buffers :-)

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-09 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-09 15:49 [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 15:54 ` [patch] factor out checks against the memlock rlimit Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 15:59 ` [patch] man-pages: add documentation about the memlock implications of io_setup Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 16:45   ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-03-09 16:48   ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-03-09 20:44     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 16:18 ` [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 17:57   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 19:45     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 20:36       ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-03-10  8:36         ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 20:31     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  2:39       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  2:44         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12  3:24           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  3:29             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12  3:33               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  3:36                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12  3:40                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  3:09         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  5:18           ` [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  5:42             ` [PATCH] aio: " Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  5:47             ` [PATCH] fs: " Andrew Morton
2009-03-12  6:10               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  6:39                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-12 13:39                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-13 22:34                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-13 22:43                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-13 23:28                     ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-14  1:40                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-14  4:02                         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-14 14:32                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-15  1:36                             ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context Davide Libenzi
2009-03-15 17:44                               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-15 20:08                                 ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (2nd rev) Davide Libenzi
2009-03-16 17:25                                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-16 18:36                                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 14:22                                   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 14:46                                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 14:55                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-18 15:25                                       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 15:43                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-18 16:13                                           ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 17:25                                     ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (3rd rev) Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 17:34                                       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-12 19:22                   ` [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 20:21                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-09 22:36 ` [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Andrew Morton
2009-03-10 13:43   ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090309203624.GA2812@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox