From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: reason for delay in arch/x86/kernel/traps.c::io_check_error()?
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:32:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090310153242.GA23463@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B56F18.1050904@nortel.com>
* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just wondering about the basis for the delay in
> io_check_error(). The ICH7 manual doesn't have any mention of
> a delay being required here--is it necessary for other
> hardware, something not mentioned in the manual, or just an
> accident?
That code has seriously bitrotten along the years. All those
port 61H accesses:
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: reason = get_nmi_reason();
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: outb(reason, 0x61);
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: outb(reason, 0x61);
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: outb(reason, 0x61);
... are often wrong on modern chipsets - including the logic in
io_check_error(). But we dont really have lowlevel chipset
drivers on this level in Linux, so there's nothing suitable to
replace it with and it never got fixed.
Can you see this trigger on a box perhaps? Or are you worried
about the potential unbound execution time of this function
which can be up to 2 seconds in NMI context?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-10 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 19:33 reason for delay in arch/x86/kernel/traps.c::io_check_error()? Chris Friesen
2009-03-10 3:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-10 15:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-12 16:20 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090310153242.GA23463@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox