public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:37:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090310223733.GA4016@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236530906-7175-1-git-send-email-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>


* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:

> Given the lack of feedback, I went ahead and implemented the 
> additions to smp_ops and x86_quirks (and a dynamic mca NMI 
> hook) to allow voyager to be plumbed in.
> 
> There also needs to be changes in the boot setup to make 
> voyager work dynamically: It has to be detected first, so the 
> a20 gate check is only executed if a voyager is not found.
> 
> I also completed some of the subarchitecture eliminations, so 
> all the include file infrastructure should be gone.
> 
> The result is that I can boot both my PC SMP x86 boxes and 
> voyager with the same kernel.
> 
> This patch series applies on the x86/apic branch of the x86 
> tree (obviously with 965c7ecaf2e2b083d711a01ab33735a4bdeee1a4 
> reverted)

The question is, why would we want to merge Voyager back ever 
again?

The hardware is obsolete and is not being produced anymore, 
nobody but you uses development kernels on it, and it caused all 
sorts of x86 maintenance overhead all along. It did not even 
build since August 2008, up until the point we removed it - 
2.6.26.0 was the last time it built.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-08 16:48 [PATCH 00/13] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48 ` [PATCH 01/13] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48   ` [PATCH 02/13] [VOYAGER] x86/mca: make mca_nmi_hook external James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48     ` [PATCH 03/13] [VOYAGER] x86: add prefill_possible_map to x86_quirks James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48       ` [PATCH 04/13] [VOYAGER] x86: use boot_cpu_id instead of zero for checking boot processor James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48         ` [PATCH 05/13] [VOYAGER] x86/voyager: Move voyager detection to a new bootparam area James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48           ` [PATCH 06/13] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file setup_arch.h James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48             ` [PATCH 07/13] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file entry_arch.h James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48               ` [PATCH 08/13] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file do_timer.h James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48                 ` [PATCH 09/13] [VOYAGER] x86: redo irq2 cascade setup James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48                   ` [PATCH 10/13] [VOYAGER] x86: make disabling the apics functional instead of a flag James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48                     ` [PATCH 11/13] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: add missing QIC call function single gate James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48                       ` [PATCH 12/13] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: replace inline io area reads with readX accessors James Bottomley
2009-03-08 16:48                         ` [PATCH 13/13] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: Plumb voyager back into the build James Bottomley
2009-03-08 17:15   ` [PATCH 01/13] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-08 17:23     ` James Bottomley
2009-03-09 20:54 ` [PATCH 00/13] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-10 21:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-10 22:02   ` James Bottomley
2009-03-10 22:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-11 15:41   ` James Bottomley
2009-03-11 17:26     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-11 18:53       ` James Bottomley
2009-03-11 22:55     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090310223733.GA4016@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox