Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure

Jason Baron
2009-03-11T15:14:36Z

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:07:28PM +1100, Greg Banks wrote:
>
> I think this patch does the same thing more cleanly.
>
> When CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled, allow callers of pr_debug()
> to provide their own definition of pr_fmt() even if that definition
> uses tricks like
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s:" fmt, __func__
>

patch looks good. I agree its simpler than what I proposed. However, I
don't think we want to add pr_fmt() in the dynamic_dev_dbg() path, since
dev_dbg() isn't doing that to start with. Other than that, I ack it.

thanks,

-Jason