From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>, Sujith <m.sujith@gmail.com>,
Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>,
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian
<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@atheros.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
Subject: Re: Staging, place holder for better company/community development model
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:00:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311050018.GB26202@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236633633.9658.23.camel@johannes.local>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:20:33PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:41 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > Staging drivers will typically be an extremely huge amount of crap that
> > > just floods mailing lists. I don't care about those I don't read, but I
> > > would prefer to not have wireless staging drivers cross the wireless
> > > list which makes it seem like somebody is actually interested in those
> > > drivers.
> >
> > I was asked by the wireless maintainer and some of the wireless
> > developers to send such patches to the list, so that everyone knows
> > exactly what is going on in the staging tree.
>
> This is a misrepresentation, a number of people have asked for this on
> specific drivers they are actively working on and that already are in
> usable shape.
Ok, so I'll be glad to not cc: the linux-wireless list if the maintainer
asks me to.
> > That's not true, some of them are being reworked as you type, to be a
> > "real" wireless driver eventually.
> >
> > Incremental development over time is sometimes a good thing, instead of
> > total rewrites :)
>
> Except it doesn't work for most of the wireless drivers you've sucked in
> without asking any wireless developers whether that makes any sense or
> not.
Any specific examples?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-03 7:14 Staging, place holder for better company/community development model Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-03-03 7:30 ` Greg KH
2009-03-03 7:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-03-03 15:56 ` Greg KH
2009-03-08 12:07 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-08 22:33 ` Greg KH
2009-03-09 7:21 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-09 19:41 ` Greg KH
2009-03-09 21:20 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-11 5:00 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-03-11 9:08 ` Johannes Berg
2009-03-11 16:02 ` Greg KH
2009-03-11 19:33 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-04-07 23:15 ` Greg KH
2009-03-08 23:02 ` Leon Woestenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090311050018.GB26202@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@atheros.com \
--cc=Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=m.sujith@gmail.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=vasanth@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox