public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Ozan Çağlayan" <ozan@pardus.org.tr>,
	"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: suggest running a 64bit kernel on LM capable machines with plenty memory.
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:38:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311123845.GF11935@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236772885.8192.241.camel@laptop>

> Esp on x86_64 machines with >=4G of memory its insane to run i386-PAE.

Not sure I would apply insane to 4GB, but it definitely applies 
to >= 16GB, likely >= 8GB. Enough known deadlocks in this case.
I would consider >=16GB on 32bit at least a kerneloops worthy condition.

Perhaps the warnings should vary in urgency.  e.g. if it's >= 16GB and 
not 2:2 split we know that the system will have problems and it should
strongly suggest, otherwise weakly.

Or perhaps it should be measured in percentage of mem_map
in lowmem?

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-11 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-07 11:04 [RFC] A simple way to determine if the kernel needs HIGHMEM64G to be able to use all the installed memory Ozan Çağlayan
2009-03-07 19:30 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-07 19:43   ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-03-08 20:20     ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-09 13:42       ` [PATCH] x86: suggest running a 64bit kernel on LM capable machines with plenty memory Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-09 19:15         ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-10  9:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-10 12:50             ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-10 13:21             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-11 12:01               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-11 12:38                 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-03-11 11:47             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090311123845.GF11935@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ozan@pardus.org.tr \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox