From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: "Wolfgang Mües" <wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mmc_spi: allow higher timeouts for SPI mode
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:02:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090311140219.GA1475@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903111428.39831.wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Wolfgang Mües wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Muees <wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de>
>
> o Some SD cards have very high timeouts in SPI mode.
> So adjust the timeouts from theory to practice.
>
[...]
> + /*
> + * Some cards need very high timeouts if driven in SPI mode.
> + * The worst observed timeout was 900ms after writing a
> + * continuous stream of data until the internal logic
> + * overflowed.
> + */
> + if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host)) {
> + if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE) {
> + if (data->timeout_ns < 1000000000)
> + data->timeout_ns = 1000000000; /* 1s */
I am correct in thinking that this patch, in conjuction with your other
patch, "[PATCH 6/7] mmc_spi: convert timeout handling to jiffies and avoid
busy waiting", will now penalize my working card and mandate a timeout
of 1 second?
Without your patch 6 at least mmc_spi_skip() would busy-wait for the
response, and if my card completed in less than 1 second then it'd just
return quicker.
It seems you've introduced a performance hit on all MMC over SPI cards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-11 13:28 [PATCH 5/7] mmc_spi: allow higher timeouts for SPI mode Wolfgang Mües
2009-03-11 14:02 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2009-03-11 14:55 ` Wolfgang Mües
2009-03-11 15:46 ` Matt Fleming
2009-03-11 16:14 ` Wolfgang Mües
2009-03-11 20:17 ` David Brownell
2009-03-12 8:16 ` Wolfgang Mües
2009-03-11 20:15 ` David Brownell
2009-03-15 11:27 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090311140219.GA1475@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=wolfgang.mues@auerswald.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox