Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: kdebugfs.c cleanup

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> >  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > -#include <linux/stat.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/stat.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/mm.h>
> > -#include <linux/module.h>
> >  
> 
> Just curious about the rule to sort those includes, and why they need
> to be rearranged.

Such includes (the 'reverse christmas tree'):

#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/mmiotrace.h>
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/vt_kern.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kdebug.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/magic.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/tty.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>

#include <asm/kmemcheck.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
#include <asm/segment.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/proto.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>

are used by x86 architecture code (and some other subsystems) to 
reduce the likelyhood of patch conflicts in commonly modified 
kernel files.

Without such ordering developers typically append to the 
existing list of include files when introducing a new header - 
creating an almost certain patch conflict. Via the above 
ordering, new headers get distributed roughly evenly amongst the 
full range - and thus the chance of patch conflicts is much 
smaller.

This way it also looks a bit more structured and bit less messy. 
It looks unprofessional and sloppy if a .c file starts with a 
big block of thrown-together include files.

	Ingo