From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Zhang Le <r0bertz@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, alan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filp->f_pos not correctly updated in proc_task_readdir
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:34:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090316083457.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237185871-3343-1-git-send-email-r0bertz@gentoo.org>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:44:31PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> filp->f_pos only get updated at the end of the function. Thus d_off of those
> dirents who are in the middle will be 0, and this will cause a problem in
> glibc's readdir implementation, specifically endless loop. Because when overflow
> occurs, f_pos will be set to next dirent to read, however it will be 0, unless
> the next one is the last one. So it will start over again and again.
Eh... Here's what's really going on:
proc_..._fill_cache() API is rather kludgy and far too convoluted. In
particular, it calls filldir() and passes file->f_pos to it, expecting
the caller to update file->f_pos between the calls. proc_task_readdir()
uses that sucker, but doesn't update ->f_pos until the very end. As
the result, d_off of direntries produced by it gets screwed.
Broken-by: commit 61a28784028e6d55755e4d0f39bee8d9bf2ee8d9
Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Mon Oct 2 02:18:49 2006 -0700
[PATCH] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers
Patch is fine, but I'd rather rip the layers of ..._fill_cache() abstractions
out and see what falls out. Anyway, for -rc your variant is definitely the
way to go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-16 6:44 [PATCH] filp->f_pos not correctly updated in proc_task_readdir Zhang Le
2009-03-16 8:34 ` Al Viro [this message]
2009-03-16 16:27 ` Zhang Le
2009-03-17 10:37 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-17 12:53 ` Zhang Le
2009-03-17 13:48 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-17 18:11 ` Al Viro
2009-03-17 18:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-18 7:27 ` Zhang Le
2009-03-18 10:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-18 13:39 ` [PATCH] proc: Fix proc_tid_readdir so it handles the weird cases Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-18 13:57 ` Louis Rilling
2009-03-19 3:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090316083457.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r0bertz@gentoo.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox