From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
Subject: Re: cli/sti vs local_cmpxchg and local_add_return
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:06:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090317160635.GE10092@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090317050135.GB6859@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:32:20PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to get access to some non-x86 hardware to run some atomic
> > primitive benchmarks for a paper on LTTng I am preparing. That should be
> > useful to argue about performance benefit of per-cpu atomic operations
> > vs interrupt disabling. I would like to run the following benchmark
> > module on CONFIG_SMP :
> >
> > - PowerPC
> > - MIPS
> > - ia64
> > - alpha
> >
> > usage :
> > make
> > insmod test-cmpxchg-nolock.ko
> > insmod: error inserting 'test-cmpxchg-nolock.ko': -1 Resource temporarily unavailable
> > dmesg (see dmesg output)
>
> Here you are on a 4.2GHz Power box:
>
> test init
> test results: time for baseline
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 12490
> -> baseline takes 0 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for locked cmpxchg
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 345748
> -> locked cmpxchg takes 17 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for non locked cmpxchg
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 198304
> -> non locked cmpxchg takes 9 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for locked add return
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 253977
> -> locked add return takes 12 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for non locked add return
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 189837
> -> non locked add return takes 9 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for enabling interrupts (STI)
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 298390
> -> enabling interrupts (STI) takes 14 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for disabling interrupts (CLI)
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 43977
> -> disabling interrupts (CLI) takes 2 cycles
> test end
> test results: time for disabling/enabling interrupts (STI/CLI)
> number of loops: 20000
> total time: 298773
> -> enabling/disabling interrupts (STI/CLI) takes 14 cycles
> test end
Thanks !
So on powerpc64, we have :
local_cmpxchg + local_add_return : 9 + 9 = 18 cycles
irq off/on : ~14-16 cycles (this is without the write and increment
instructions performing the same work as the cmpxchg and add_return.
Imprecision of the measurement is probably due to pipeline effect).
But powerpc has non-maskable interrupts, so for less than 4 cycles, I
think it's better to stay with the local_t variant to be NMI-safe.
Mathieu
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>
> > If some of you would be kind enough to run my test module provided below
> > and provide the results of these tests on a recent kernel (2.6.26~2.6.29
> > should be good) along with their cpuinfo, I would greatly appreciate.
> >
> > Here are the CAS results for various Intel-based architectures :
> >
> > Architecture | Speedup | CAS | Interrupts |
> > | (cli + sti) / local cmpxchg | local | sync | Enable (sti) | Disable (cli)
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Intel Pentium 4 | 5.24 | 25 | 81 | 70 | 61 |
> > AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 | 4.57 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 15 |
> > Intel Core2 | 6.33 | 6 | 30 | 20 | 18 |
> > Intel Xeon E5405 | 5.25 | 8 | 24 | 20 | 22 |
> >
> > The benefit expected on PowerPC, ia64 and alpha should principally come
> > from removed memory barriers in the local primitives.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mathieu
> >
> > P.S. please forgive the coding style and hackish interface. :)
> >
> >
> > /* test-cmpxchg-nolock.c
> > *
> > * Compare local cmpxchg with irq disable / enable.
> > */
> >
> >
> > #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/math64.h>
> > #include <asm/timex.h>
> > #include <asm/system.h>
> >
> > #define NR_LOOPS 20000
> >
> > int test_val;
> >
> > static void do_testbaseline(void)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > asm volatile ("");
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for baseline\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> baseline takes %llu cycles\n", time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> > static void do_test_sync_cmpxchg(void)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > ret = sync_cmpxchg(&test_val, 0, 0);
> > #else
> > ret = cmpxchg(&test_val, 0, 0);
> > #endif
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for locked cmpxchg\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> locked cmpxchg takes %llu cycles\n", time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> > static void do_test_cmpxchg(void)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > ret = cmpxchg_local(&test_val, 0, 0);
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for non locked cmpxchg\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> non locked cmpxchg takes %llu cycles\n", time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> > static void do_test_sync_inc(void)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> > atomic_t val;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > ret = atomic_add_return(10, &val);
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for locked add return\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> locked add return takes %llu cycles\n", time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> >
> > static void do_test_inc(void)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> > local_t loc_val;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > ret = local_add_return(10, &loc_val);
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for non locked add return\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> non locked add return takes %llu cycles\n", time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > /*
> > * This test will have a higher standard deviation due to incoming interrupts.
> > */
> > static void do_test_enable_int(void)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for enabling interrupts (STI)\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> enabling interrupts (STI) takes %llu cycles\n",
> > time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> > static void do_test_disable_int(void)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags, flags2;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for ( i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > local_irq_save(flags2);
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for disabling interrupts (CLI)\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> disabling interrupts (CLI) takes %llu cycles\n",
> > time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> > static void do_test_int(void)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > cycles_t time1, time2, time;
> > u32 rem;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > preempt_disable();
> > time1 = get_cycles();
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > }
> > time2 = get_cycles();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > preempt_enable();
> > time = time2 - time1;
> >
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test results: time for disabling/enabling interrupts (STI/CLI)\n");
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "number of loops: %d\n", NR_LOOPS);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "total time: %llu\n", time);
> > time = div_u64_rem(time, NR_LOOPS, &rem);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "-> enabling/disabling interrupts (STI/CLI) takes %llu cycles\n",
> > time);
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test end\n");
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > static int ltt_test_init(void)
> > {
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test init\n");
> >
> > do_testbaseline();
> > do_test_sync_cmpxchg();
> > do_test_cmpxchg();
> > do_test_sync_inc();
> > do_test_inc();
> > do_test_enable_int();
> > do_test_disable_int();
> > do_test_int();
> > return -EAGAIN; /* Fail will directly unload the module */
> > }
> >
> > static void ltt_test_exit(void)
> > {
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "test exit\n");
> > }
> >
> > module_init(ltt_test_init)
> > module_exit(ltt_test_exit)
> >
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("Mathieu Desnoyers");
> > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cmpxchg vs int Test");
> >
> >
> >
> > * Makefile
> >
> > ifneq ($(KERNELRELEASE),)
> > obj-m += test-cmpxchg-nolock.o
> > else
> > KERNELDIR ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build
> > PWD := $(shell pwd)
> > KERNELRELEASE = $(shell cat $(KERNELDIR)/$(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/include/linux/version.h | sed -n 's/.*UTS_RELEASE.*\"\(.*\)\".*/\1/p')
> > ifneq ($(INSTALL_MOD_PATH),)
> > DEPMOD_OPT := -b $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)
> > endif
> >
> > default:
> > $(MAKE) -C $(KERNELDIR) M=$(PWD) modules
> >
> > modules_install:
> > $(MAKE) -C $(KERNELDIR) M=$(PWD) modules_install
> > if [ -f $(KERNELDIR)/$(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/System.map ] ; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F $(KERNELDIR)/$(KBUILD_OUTPUT)/System.map $(DEPMOD_OPT) $(KERNELRELEASE) ; fi
> >
> >
> > clean:
> > $(MAKE) -C $(KERNELDIR) M=$(PWD) clean
> > endif
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 1:32 cli/sti vs local_cmpxchg and local_add_return Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 3:37 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 4:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 4:27 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 4:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 5:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-17 16:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-03-17 19:28 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 19:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 6:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17 15:14 ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-18 11:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-18 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 18:42 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2009-03-17 19:01 ` Andika Triwidada
2009-03-23 16:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-18 11:56 ` Josh Boyer
2009-03-23 16:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-23 17:04 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090317160635.GE10092@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox