From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com,
steiner@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask work
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:22:30 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903180822.31196.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1LjeSk-0004BW-3x@eag09.americas.sgi.com>
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 05:26:30 Cliff Wickman wrote:
>
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
>
> A patch on Mar13 2009 introduced a bug. I hope the below 1-line fix can
> make the 'urgent' list, and get fixed before that patch moves on.
>
> The Mar13 patch is saved at
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123683186504948&w=2
>
> The allocation of per-cpu uv_flush_tlb_mask's in arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
> changed a variable that should been reset to 0.
Hi Cliff,
Thanks for tracking this. May I suggest this slightly enhanced version?
Subject: cpumask: fix tlb_uv initialization
Impact: fix boot on UV systems
Commit 76ba0ecda0de9accea9a91cb6dbde46782110e1c "cpumask: use cpumask_var_t
in uv_flush_tlb_others" used cur_cpu as an iterator; it was supposed to be
zero for the code below it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
index 8afb691..deb5ebb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
int node;
int nblades;
int last_blade;
- int cur_cpu = 0;
+ int cur_cpu;
if (!is_uv_system())
return 0;
@@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
uv_mmask = (1UL << uv_hub_info->n_val) - 1;
nblades = 0;
last_blade = -1;
+ cur_cpu = 0;
for_each_online_node(node) {
blade = uv_node_to_blade_id(node);
if (blade == last_blade)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 18:56 [PULL] x86 cpumask work Cliff Wickman
2009-03-17 21:52 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-03-18 8:51 ` [tip:x86/uv] x86, uv: fix cpumask iterator in uv_bau_init() Rusty Russell
2009-03-18 12:57 ` [PULL] x86 cpumask work Cliff Wickman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-12 4:23 Rusty Russell
2009-03-12 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 22:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 0:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 2:46 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 3:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 4:34 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 4:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 5:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 5:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 6:44 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 13:12 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 15:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 2:56 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-15 6:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-16 3:03 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-16 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 4:20 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-17 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 21:27 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903180822.31196.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).