From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:15:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320041500.GB26595@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C1FE8A.9000401@jp.fujitsu.com>
* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Alex Chiang wrote:
>> We're getting close to the new merge window, and I _think_ this
>> patch series is ready for consideration. Notably:
>>
>> - multiple rescans/removes of devices with and without bridges
>> - verified that resource allocation after multiple remove/rescan
>> cycles is the same as what we had during initial boot
>> - fixes the complete suckage of fakephp (that I created)
>> - doesn't affect existing hotplug drivers
>> - tested on x86 and ia64 platforms
>>
>> Please review, and consider testing. For testing ease, you can pull
>> from my git branch:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/achiang/pci-hotplug.git
>> branch 'test-20090318' is what you want
>>
>
> I got the following oops when I did
>
> # echo 1 > remove
>
> on the bridge device.
>
> [ 6639.239164] =============================================
> [ 6639.239191] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [ 6639.239212] 2.6.29-rc8-kk #1
> [ 6639.239227] ---------------------------------------------
> [ 6639.239243] events/8/60 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 6639.239252] (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257fc0>] flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252]
> [ 6639.239252] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 6639.239252] (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.239252]
> [ 6639.239252] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 6639.239252] 3 locks held by events/8/60:
> [ 6639.239252] #0: (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.239252] #1: (&ss->work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.239252] #2: (pci_remove_rescan_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff803c05b9>] remove_callback+0x29/0x80
> [ 6639.239252]
> [ 6639.239252] stack backtrace:
> [ 6639.239252] Pid: 60, comm: events/8 Not tainted 2.6.29-rc8-kk #1
> [ 6639.239252] Call Trace:
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff8026dfcd>] validate_chain+0xb7d/0x1260
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff8026eade>] __lock_acquire+0x42e/0xa40
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff8026f148>] lock_acquire+0x58/0x80
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff80257fc0>] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff8025800d>] flush_workqueue+0x4d/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff80257fc0>] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff80258070>] flush_scheduled_work+0x10/0x20
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffffa0158065>] e1000_remove+0x55/0xfe [e1000e]
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff8033ee60>] ? sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x0/0x50
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff803bf7a2>] pci_device_remove+0x32/0x70
> [ 6639.239252] [<ffffffff80441409>] __device_release_driver+0x59/0x90
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8044153b>] device_release_driver+0x2b/0x40
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff80441036>] bus_remove_device+0xa6/0x120
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8043dacb>] device_del+0x12b/0x190
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8043db56>] device_unregister+0x26/0x70
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff803ba529>] pci_stop_dev+0x49/0x60
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff803ba670>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x40/0xc0
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff803ba71d>] pci_remove_behind_bridge+0x2d/0x50
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff803ba64e>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x1e/0xc0
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff803c05c8>] remove_callback+0x38/0x80
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8033ee7f>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x1f/0x50
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8025769a>] run_workqueue+0x15a/0x230
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff80257648>] ? run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8025846f>] worker_thread+0x9f/0x100
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8025bce0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff802583d0>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x100
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8025b89d>] kthread+0x4d/0x80
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8020d4ba>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8020cebc>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8025b850>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
> [ 6639.241006] [<ffffffff8020d4b0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> [ 6639.283330] e1000e 0000:40:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
> [ 6639.324332] e1000e 0000:40:00.1: PCI INT B disabled
> [ 6639.325031] aer 0000:2f:04.0:pcie22: unloading service driver aer
pci_device_remove() calls the driver's ->remove method directly;
it shouldn't be messing around with that sysfs callback.
Does this only happen with e1000e devices? Or does it happen on
any bridge device?
I am stumped; I've never seen this locking issue before...
Will continue to look, thanks.
/ac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 22:39 [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] PCI: pci_is_root_bus helper Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] PCI: don't scan existing devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] PCI: pci_scan_slot() returns newly found devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] PCI: always scan child buses Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] PCI: do not initialize bridges more than once Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] PCI: Introduce pci_rescan_bus() Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 9:27 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:05 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 17:42 ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 17:49 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 18:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-19 18:09 ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 9:29 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 9:34 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 22:55 ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 23:21 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 9:43 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 16:06 ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 16:30 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 14:17 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 16:41 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 20:43 ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 20:46 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 23:19 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-20 3:53 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] PCI Hotplug: restore fakephp interface with complete reimplementation Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 9:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:00 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 19:24 ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] PCI Hotplug: rename legacy_fakephp to fakephp Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] PCI Hotplug: schedule fakephp for feature removal Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 8:12 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:07 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20 4:15 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-03-19 14:09 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:13 ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20 5:16 ` Alex Chiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090320041500.GB26595@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox