public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:16:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320051646.GD26595@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C25203.60005@jp.fujitsu.com>

* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Alex Chiang wrote:
>> We're getting close to the new merge window, and I _think_ this
>> patch series is ready for consideration. Notably:
>>
>> 	- multiple rescans/removes of devices with and without bridges
>> 	- verified that resource allocation after multiple remove/rescan
>> 	  cycles is the same as what we had during initial boot
>> 	- fixes the complete suckage of fakephp (that I created)
>> 	- doesn't affect existing hotplug drivers
>> 	- tested on x86 and ia64 platforms
>>
>> Please review, and consider testing. For testing ease, you can pull
>> from my git branch:
>>
>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/achiang/pci-hotplug.git
>> 	branch 'test-20090318' is what you want
>>
>
> When I rescan the bus even without remove anything, I got the
> following messages. And enable count of the bridge is incremented
> every time.
>
> [17240.309096] pci 0000:2d:00.0: BAR 6: bogus alignment [0x0-0x0] flags 0x2

I'm not sure where this is coming from.

> [17240.309135] pcieport-driver 0000:00:01.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309143] pcieport-driver 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309150] pcieport-driver 0000:14:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309159] pcieport-driver 0000:15:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309166] pcieport-driver 0000:15:01.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309174] pcieport-driver 0000:15:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309182] pci 0000:14:00.3: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309189] pcieport-driver 0000:00:03.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309198] pcieport-driver 0000:2a:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309207] pcieport-driver 0000:2b:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309215] pcieport-driver 0000:2b:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309223] pcieport-driver 0000:00:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309231] pcieport-driver 0000:2e:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309240] pcieport-driver 0000:2f:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309248] pcieport-driver 0000:2f:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309256] pcieport-driver 0000:00:06.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309264] pcieport-driver 0000:51:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309273] pcieport-driver 0000:52:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309281] pcieport-driver 0000:52:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309291] pci 0000:64:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309300] pcieport-driver 0000:00:1c.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [17240.309308] pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64
>
> [root@localhost pci]# echo 1 > rescan
> [root@localhost pci]# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:2f\:04.0/enable
> 6
> [root@localhost pci]# echo 1 > rescan
> [root@localhost pci]# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:2f\:04.0/enable
> 7
> [root@localhost pci]# echo 1 > rescan
> [root@localhost pci]# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:2f\:04.0/enable
> 8
> [root@localhost pci]# echo 1 > rescan
> [root@localhost pci]# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:2f\:04.0/enable
> 9

But the above should be fixed with a new patch that I added
today.

Would you mind testing again?

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/achiang/pci-hotplug.git test-20090319

I still haven't figured out why you're seeing that recursive lock
warning.

Thanks.

/ac


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-20  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18 22:39 [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] PCI: pci_is_root_bus helper Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] PCI: don't scan existing devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] PCI: pci_scan_slot() returns newly found devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] PCI: always scan child buses Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] PCI: do not initialize bridges more than once Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] PCI: Introduce pci_rescan_bus() Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:27   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:05     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 17:42       ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 17:49         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 18:09           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-19 18:09           ` Greg KH
2009-03-19  9:29   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:34   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 22:55       ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 23:21         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:43   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 16:06     ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 16:30     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 14:17   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 16:41     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 20:43       ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 20:46         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 23:19       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-20  3:53         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] PCI Hotplug: restore fakephp interface with complete reimplementation Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:45   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:00     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 19:24     ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] PCI Hotplug: rename legacy_fakephp to fakephp Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] PCI Hotplug: schedule fakephp for feature removal Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  8:12 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:07   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20  4:15   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 14:09 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:13   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20  5:16   ` Alex Chiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090320051646.GD26595@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox