From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756167AbZCUBrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:47:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752860AbZCUBrO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:47:14 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42961 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752490AbZCUBrO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:47:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:43:28 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Eric Anholt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Jesse Barnes , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: [patch 38/43] drm/i915: set vblank enabled flag correctly across IRQ install/uninstall Message-ID: <20090321004328.GA4396@suse.de> References: <20090320222810.386844059@mini.kroah.org> <20090320222928.879548230@mini.kroah.org> <1237594162.4892.24.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1237594162.4892.24.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:09:22PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 15:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > plain text document attachment > > (drm-i915-set-vblank-enabled-flag-correctly-across-irq-install-uninstall.patch) > > 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > I think we're good to go on the DRM series. > > jbarnes: any concerns about the vblank patches that just got > queued to 2.6.28? > no, though there's still one regression open against aiglx vt > switch > ok, but it's a regression before those queued patches? > yeah I think so Great, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h