From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2] mm: introduce debug_kmap_atomic
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:23:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090322172333.7d7fde92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090314131555.GB17727@elte.hu>
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:15:55 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:39:31AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > x86: unify kmap_atomic_pfn() and iomap_atomic_prot_pfn(), fix
> > >
> > > Impact: build fix
> > >
> > > Move kmap_atomic_prot_pfn() to iomap_32.c. It is used on all 32-bit
> > > kernels, while highmem_32.c is only built on highmem kernels.
> >
> > Thanks for fixing that.
> >
> > > ( Note: the debug_kmap_atomic_prot() check is removed for now, that
> > > problem is handled via another patch. )
> >
> > The patches are now sitting in -mmotm now. For -tip, here are the rebased
> > patches for the debug_kmap_atomic_prot() check.
>
> Due to the other-arch changes it's better to keep them in -mm i
> guess. Once the current batch goes out to linux-next (in the
> next few days) Andrew could pick up the two -tip patches you
> posted here.
I really don't know what's going on here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-11 14:33 [PATCH 1/2] x86: unify kmap_atomic_pfn() and iomap_atomic_prot_pfn() Akinobu Mita
2009-03-11 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: debug check for kmap_atomic_pfn " Akinobu Mita
2009-03-11 16:54 ` [tip:x86/mm] " Akinobu Mita
2009-03-11 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: unify kmap_atomic_pfn() " Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-11 15:25 ` Akinobu Mita
2009-03-11 16:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 0:28 ` Akinobu Mita
2009-03-12 12:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 12:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 16:54 ` [tip:x86/mm] " Akinobu Mita
2009-03-13 1:39 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: unify kmap_atomic_pfn() and iomap_atomic_prot_pfn(), fix Ingo Molnar
2009-03-14 4:19 ` [PATCH -tip 1/2] mm: introduce debug_kmap_atomic Akinobu Mita
2009-03-14 4:20 ` [PATCH -tip 2/2] mm: use debug_kmap_atomic Akinobu Mita
2009-03-14 13:15 ` [PATCH -tip 1/2] mm: introduce debug_kmap_atomic Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 15:15 ` Akinobu Mita
2009-03-15 20:45 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: remove unnecessary include file from iomap_32.c Akinobu Mita
2009-03-23 0:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-03-24 6:21 ` [PATCH -tip 1/2] mm: introduce debug_kmap_atomic Akinobu Mita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090322172333.7d7fde92.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox