From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759620AbZCXSbT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:31:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753849AbZCXSbB (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:31:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:51950 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756510AbZCXSbA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:31:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:26:51 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, ia6432@inbox.ru, roland@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] posix timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork() Message-ID: <20090324182651.GA13408@redhat.com> References: <20090323193411.GA17514@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Commit-ID: 37bebc70d7ad4144c571d74500db3bb26ec0c0eb > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/37bebc70d7ad4144c571d74500db3bb26ec0c0eb > Author: Oleg Nesterov > AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:34:11 +0100 > Committer: Ingo Molnar > CommitDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:43:35 +0100 > > posix timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork() > > See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12911 > > copy_signal() copies signal->rlim, but RLIMIT_CPU is "lost". Because > posix_cpu_timers_init_group() sets cputime_expires.prof_exp = 0 and thus > fastpath_timer_check() returns false unless we have other cpu timers. > > This is the minimal fix for 2.6.29 (tested) and 2.6.28. The patch is not > optimal, Ingo, please drop this patch, it is very suboptimal. My intent was to make the obviously correct patch for 2.6.29, but since it was already released I'll send another one. And, > we need further cleanups here. With this patch update_rlimit_cpu() > is not really needed, but I don't think it should be removed. > > The proper fix (I think) is: > > - set_process_cpu_timer() should just start the cputimer->running > logic (it does), no need to change cputime_expires.xxx_exp I am stupid, of course we should set cputime_expires.xxx_exp to avoid the slow path in run_posix_cpu_timers(). Oleg.