From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Avoid double-free of dyn_ftrace
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:35:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090325023531.GA9748@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7867D4500D2F4CFFB36A9EA93C0DC2D5@zhaoleiwin>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:25:47AM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm wondering, did you trigger this in practice (if yes, how?),
> >> > or have you found it via code review?
> >> Hello, Ingo
> >>
> >> It is found via code review.
> >
> > Hmm, could you explain this more. I'm thinking that this scenario should
> > not happen, and if it does, it should probably be a bug.
> >
> > Because when we call ftrace_free_rec we change the rec->ip to point to the
> > next record in the chain. Something is very wrong if rec->ip >= s &&
> > rec->ip < e and the record is already free.
> Hello, Steven
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> I got your meaning, and I agree that if rec->ip >= s && rec->ip < e,
> this record is not freed.
> But IMHO, "if rec->ip >= s && rec->ip < e" is used to select records in the module,
> and function of ignore "freed record" is only its side-effect.
> So, add a special judgement to avoid "freed record" is not a bad idea.
> And I also agree your suggestion of add a WARN_ON, because this should not happened.
Hi Zhaolei,
Great! Feel free to send another patch ;-)
Note, use FTRACE_WARN_ON() macro. This way it shuts down ftrace if it is hit and
helps to avoid further damage later.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-13 9:14 [PATCH] ftrace: Avoid double-free of dyn_ftrace Zhaolei
2009-03-13 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 9:30 ` Zhaolei
2009-03-24 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 2:25 ` Zhaolei
2009-03-25 2:35 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-03-13 9:33 ` [tip:tracing/ftrace] ftrace: avoid " Zhaolei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090325023531.GA9748@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox