From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:19:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090325071932.GA25833@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090325051920.406564281@goodmis.org>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> I guess this can go through you. This is a start of clean ups to
> get rid of (un)likelys that are at least 50% incorrect. This
> series has some that are 100% incorrect.
Nice!
I'll wait for the acks from affected (and Cc:-ed) maintainers though
- and they might decide to carry the patches in their trees straight
away (or disagree with the change) so a rebase is in the cards as
well.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 5:19 [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: remove incorrect unlikelys Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 13:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-03-25 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 9:28 ` Roland McGrath
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove unlikly NULL from kfree Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 7:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 7:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-25 8:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-25 8:02 ` Hua Zhong
2009-03-25 8:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 13:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 14:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 14:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 15:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 16:14 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-25 21:09 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 21:01 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 16:10 ` Al Viro
2009-03-26 16:15 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: remove unlikely in pre_schedule_rt Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: remove unlikelys from sched_move_task Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove unlikelys for unlock in rmap.c Steven Rostedt
2009-04-24 11:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-24 12:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-03-25 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-25 7:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 16:30 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090325071932.GA25833@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox