From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754809AbZCYA7f (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:59:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752821AbZCYA70 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:59:26 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:38787 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752368AbZCYA7Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:59:25 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity? Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:29:19 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar References: <200903241619.03517.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200903251103.10249.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200903251103.10249.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903251129.19490.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:03:08 Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:09:37 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > cpu_mask_to_apic_id do not take cpu_online_map into account and should > > probably be fixed. flat_cpu_mask_to_apicid was the one I could find. > > Also the numaq apic.h. I'll do an audit and send a patch. Actually, numaq is just weird, so I'll assume it's correct. I couldn't find any others. > Yes, agree with Yinghai's fix. I'll re-spin my patch on top of his. But he already did it while I slept in. Thanks Yinghai! Rusty.