From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: add average time in function to function profiler
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:29:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090326222924.GA28755@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327091507.f133257e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:07:39 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
> >
> > Show the average time in the function (Time / Hit)
>
> Just wondering why we need to do this in the kernel ... there is
> already enough information for a user to figure these averages
> out.
Well, this argument can be applied to a lot of information exposed
in /proc and /sys. For example in theory there's no need for
/proc/interrupts at all, because the IRQ mappings are present in the
syslog and in /sys enumerations and the IRQ counts are present in
/proc/stat already.
I still find /proc/interrupts very handy, despite purist arguments
that it is redundant and that it thus should not be there.
So we provide such things when it's easy to do, when it's a
meaningful piece of information and it is convenient to users and
developers.
Note that the function profiler is a double-non-default item in
/debug (you need to enable two non-default options in the .config to
get it), so you cannot stumble on it accidentally.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 1:07 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] function profiler updates Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 1:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: remove on the fly allocator from function profiler Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 1:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: add average time in function to " Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 22:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-26 22:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-26 23:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 8:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] function profiler updates Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090326222924.GA28755@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox