From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, roland@redhat.com,
eranian@googlemail.com, juan.villacis@intel.com,
ak@linux.jf.intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch 4/14] x86, ds: wait before freeing the DS configuration
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090327143556.GE14504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090327095840.A11187@sedona.ch.intel.com>
On 03/27, Markus Metzger wrote:
>
> --- git-tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/ds.c 2009-03-27 07:59:23.000000000 +0100
> +++ git-tip/arch/x86/kernel/ds.c 2009-03-27 08:00:41.000000000 +0100
> @@ -783,6 +783,14 @@ void ds_release_bts(struct bts_tracer *t
>
> ds_suspend_bts(tracer);
>
> + /*
> + * We must wait for the suspend to take effect before we may
> + * free the tracer and the ds configuration.
> + */
> + if (tracer->ds.context->task &&
> + (tracer->ds.context->task != current))
> + wait_task_inactive(tracer->ds.context->task, 0);
> +
Since you didn't replay yet, I will just repeat my question ;)
I am not sure I understand the problem. From the changelog:
If the children are currently executing, the buffer
may be freed while the hardware is still tracing.
This might cause the hardware to overwrite memory.
So, the problem is that ds.context->task must not be running before we
can start to disable/free ds, yes? Something like ds_switch_to() should
be completed, right?
In that case I don't really understand how wait_task_inactive() can help.
If the task is killed it can be scheduled again, right after
wait_task_inactive() returns.
Also. This function is called from ptrace_bts_exit_tracer(), when the
tracee is not stopped. In this case wait_task_inactive() can spin forever.
For example, if the tracee simply does "for (;;) ;" it never succeeds.
If my understanding of the problem is wrong, could you please explain
it for dummies?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 8:58 [patch 4/14] x86, ds: wait before freeing the DS configuration Markus Metzger
2009-03-27 14:35 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-03-27 15:39 ` Metzger, Markus T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090327143556.GE14504@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=juan.villacis@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@gmail.com \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox