From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: remove wrong ifdef
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:37:47 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903281937.48755.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CDAB6E.90006@kernel.org>
On Saturday 28 March 2009 15:15:34 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Impact: fix smp_affinity copying
>
> CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK is not defined anywhere.
> and init_allocate_desc_masks called before it set affinity to all cpus...
>
> just remove those #idef to make them get copied
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -468,20 +468,16 @@ static inline bool init_alloc_desc_masks
> * @new_desc: pointer to new irq_desc struct
> *
> * Insures affinity and pending_masks are copied to new irq_desc.
> - * If !CONFIG_CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK the cpumasks are embedded in the
> - * irq_desc struct so the copy is redundant.
> */
>
> static inline void init_copy_desc_masks(struct irq_desc *old_desc,
> struct irq_desc *new_desc)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK
> cpumask_copy(new_desc->affinity, old_desc->affinity);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> cpumask_copy(new_desc->pending_mask, old_desc->pending_mask);
> #endif
> -#endif
> }
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
Wow, that is supposed to be CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
The reason it is there is that we already do the memcpy of old_desc: this
extra copy is only needed if the cpumasks are external. But perhaps it's
an over-optimization.
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-28 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-28 4:44 [PATCH] irq: only update affinity in chip set_affinity() Yinghai Lu
2009-03-28 4:45 ` [PATCH] irq: remove wrong ifdef Yinghai Lu
2009-03-28 9:07 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-03-28 20:09 ` [PATCH] irq: correct CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK typo -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-29 2:03 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-28 20:12 ` [PATCH] irq: remove wrong ifdef Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903281937.48755.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox