From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
Michael E Brown <Michael_E_Brown@dell.com>
Subject: Class device namespaces
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090329174836.6de797d6@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
Hi Greg,
I am a little confused by the directories created when one registers a
class device. When a class device is registered as the children of a
real device, a subdirectory by the class name is created, and the class
device is created there, effectively granting each class a separate
namespace. Example:
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/i2c-adapter/i2c-0
where 0000:00:1f.3 is the physical device, i2c-adapter the class name
and i2c-0 the class device.
OTOH, if I create a class device as the children of another class
device, the class device is created directly, without a directory
between the parent and the child. Example:
/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-0/i2c-0
where the first i2c-0 is an i2c-adapter class device, and the second
i2c-0 is an i2c-dev class device. I would have expected:
/sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-0/i2c-dev/i2c-0
The current behavior seems inconsistent to me. Is it done so on purpose,
or is this accidental? If on purpose, what's the reason?
I am asking because this is causing trouble in practice. We have both
i2c-dev and firmware_class which try to create class devices by the
same name and this of course collides. While I would blame
firmware_class for coming up with an horrible naming scheme (or
actually, for not coming up with any naming scheme) it might still be a
good idea to prevent such collisions at the driver core level.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-29 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-29 15:48 Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-03-29 16:36 ` Class device namespaces Kay Sievers
2009-03-30 8:49 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-30 11:24 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-26 6:54 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-26 12:44 ` Matt Domsch
2009-04-26 13:01 ` Matt Domsch
2009-04-27 15:30 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-27 17:30 ` Matt Domsch
2009-04-26 13:42 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-27 16:00 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-27 21:57 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 8:08 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-28 12:36 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-29 12:19 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-27 13:20 ` Michael E Brown
2009-04-27 15:27 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-27 17:23 ` Michael Brown
2009-04-28 8:10 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-28 17:39 ` Doug Warzecha
2009-04-28 17:46 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 21:58 ` Doug Warzecha
2009-04-29 1:42 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-29 3:19 ` Michael Brown
2009-04-29 10:30 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-29 17:00 ` Michael Brown
2009-04-29 19:10 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-29 21:28 ` Michael Brown
2009-04-29 21:53 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-30 15:18 ` David Dillow
2009-04-30 16:34 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-28 19:06 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090329174836.6de797d6@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=Michael_E_Brown@dell.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox